In 1984, a report entitled, "Surviving in the System: Mental Retardation and the Retarding Environment," detailed how placing individuals with cognitive disabilities in institutions or congregate settings puts them in "retarding environments." Who were the architects of this impressive and profound revelation? A group of people who had been assigned the stigma-laden "mental retardation" label (the People First chapter of California).
Retarding environments can exist anywhere individuals with disabilities are prevented from experiencing ordinary, natural lives.
Today, "retarding environments" can be found at home, in school, and in other settings. But how can typical environments be "retarding?" Because many individuals with disabilities do not have the tools and accommodations they need, which causes their social, emotional, and intellectual growth to be slowed down, or retarded.
Sara, a three-year-old with an orthopedic disability, is not crawling or walking. She's positioned properly in a manual wheelchair, but she must always be pushed by someone. As a result, Sara isn't able to experience the vast amount of learning that occurs when three-year-olds explore their world: going where and when she wants in her own home, learning she can "run away" from mom and return, achieving a new level of independence, and more. Her intellectual and social development are significantly impacted, and Sara is learning dependence in retarding environments at home, in preschool, and in other settings.
Her parents and therapists are focused on getting Sara to walk. That, they believe, is the "problem" that needs to be remedied. While focusing on one ability (walking), other-and more important-aspects of Sara's development are in jeopardy.
But what if Sara had independent mobility (a power wheelchair) so she could explore and learn, acquire typical social skills, and develop independence? Which is more important: walking or mastering her world in whatever way works best for her?
Brian, a nine-year-old with a cognitive disability, is said to "function at the level of a six-year-old." Because he can't yet read, educators (and his parents) don't feel he could be successful in a regular class, so Brian has spent three years in the special ed room, where teachers have focused on teaching him to read.
This placement has produced extremely negative outcomes for Brian. Being in the "retard room" makes him feel bad about himself. His struggles against these feelings is leading adults to presume he has "behavior problems." Also, because he's in the special ed room, he is not exposed to the typical classroom curriculum, which causes him to fall further and further behind. Sadly, he'll probably spend the remainder of his school career in special classes, and he'll leave the public school system uneducated and unprepared for work or post-secondary education, after spending twelve years in retarding environments.
While educators and Brian's parents focused on one skill (reading), Brian lost countless opportunities to learn from the typical activities in regular ed classes. There are many ways of learning: through hands-on activities, using computer programs and videos, listening, and more. The inability to read need not be a barrier to learning and academic success! Overall, which is more important: reading or learning in any way you can?
Mary Ann has spent years in a sheltered workshop being "prepared" for a real job. She hates making widgets all day, but staff thinks she's incapable of anything more. Like Brian, Mary Ann rebels against the insults to her dignity, using the only power she has left: resistance. According to staff, her behavior "proves" Mary Ann is not ready for a real job.
Retarding environments are not limited to segregated or congregate settings. They can exist anywhere individuals with disabilities are prevented from living ordinary, natural lives and having power over their environments.
We must look at children and adults and presume competence.
How can we prevent retarding environments? First, by understanding that people with disabilities need the same experiences for growth and development as people without disabilities. To meet that goal, children and adults with disabilities must be in age-appropriate, typical, ordinary, inclusive settings.
Next, people with disabilities must have the tools, accommodations, and supports they need to be successful in ordinary, inclusive environments. Few people without disabilities would be successful if they didn't have appropriate tools and accommodations (computers, cell phones, support from peers, and so forth), so why is it OK for people with disabilities to go without the tools and support they need?
And, finally, we must look at people with disabilities and presume competence. The language and labels we use, along with programs which attempt to fix a person's "problems," reflect the paradigm that people with disabilities are incompetent and unable. But they're not! When we operate from the "presume competence" paradigm, we'll ensure the Saras, Brians, and Mary Anns of this world are in natural, ordinary, and inclusive, environments, with the tools, accommodations, and support they need for success.
© 2001 Kathie Snow Used with permission; for permission to reprint, contact email@example.com - www.disabilityisnatural.com
Have Your Say:
We welcome relevant discussions, criticism and your unique insights. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved. NOTE: We do not verify information posted in the comment section.