Different Ways Between How Women and Men Choose Partners

Author: Concordia University
Published: 2014/05/01 - Updated: 2021/07/25
Contents: Summary - Main - Related Publications

Synopsis: Concordia University research study reveals surprising new evidence about how human males and females choose our partners. The researchers tested the framing effect using six key attributes, two of which are more important to men and women respectively, and two that are considered as necessities by both sexes. Women also proved more susceptible to framing effects in attributes like ambition and earning potential, while men responded more strongly to framing when physical attractiveness was described.

Main Digest

A hamburger that's 90 percent fat-free sounds a lot better than one with 10 percent fat. And even when the choices are the same, humans are hard-wired to prefer the more positive option. This is because of what's known as the "framing effect," a principle that new research from Concordia has proved applies to mate selection, too.

The study, co-authored by Concordia marketing professor Gad Saad and Wilfrid Laurier University's Tripat Gill, and published in the journal Evolution and Human Behavior, shows that when we choose a partner, the framing effect is even stronger in women than it is for men.

"When it comes to mate selection, women are more attuned to negatively framed information due to an evolutionary phenomenon called 'parental investment theory,'" says Saad, who has done extensive research on the evolutionary and biological roots of consumer behavior.

"Choosing someone who might be a poor provider or an unloving father would have serious consequences for a woman and for her offspring. So we hypothesized that women would naturally be more leery of negatively framed information when evaluating a prospective mate."

To prove this, Saad and Gill called on hundreds of young men and women to take part in their study. Participants were given positively and negatively framed descriptions of potential partners. For example:

1 - Seven out of 10 people who know this person think that this person is kind. (positive frame)

Versus

2 - Three out of 10 people who know this person think that this person is not kind. (negative frame)

The researchers tested the framing effect using six key attributes, two of which are more important to men and women respectively, and two that are considered as necessities by both sexes:

Participants evaluated both high-quality (e.g. seven out of 10 people think this person is kind) and low-quality (e.g. three out of 10 people think this person is kind) prospective mates for these attributes, in the context of a short-term fling or a long-term relationship.

More often than not, women said they were far less likely to date the potential mates described in the negatively framed descriptions - even though in each instance, they were being presented with exactly the same information as in the positively framed descriptions.

Women also proved more susceptible to framing effects in attributes like ambition and earning potential, while men responded more strongly to framing when physical attractiveness was described.

This research highlights how an evolutionary lens could help explain the biological origins of seemingly "irrational" decision-making biases like the framing effect.

Attribution/Source(s):

This quality-reviewed publication titled "Different Ways Between How Women and Men Choose Partners" was chosen for publishing by Disabled World's editors due to its relevance to our readers in the disability community. While the content may have been edited for style, clarity, or brevity, it was originally authored by Concordia University and published 2014/05/01 (Edit Update: 2021/07/25). For further details or clarifications, you can contact Concordia University directly at concordia.ca. Please note that Disabled World does not provide any warranties or endorsements related to this article.

📢 Discover Related Topics


👍 Share This Information To:
𝕏.com Facebook Reddit

Page Information, Citing and Disclaimer

Disabled World is an independent disability community founded in 2004 to provide disability news and information to people with disabilities, seniors, their family and/or carers. You can connect with us on social media such as X.com and our Facebook page.

Cite This Page (APA): Concordia University. (2014, May 1). Different Ways Between How Women and Men Choose Partners. Disabled World. Retrieved April 19, 2024 from www.disabled-world.com/communication/disabled-dating/advice/partners.php

Permalink: <a href="https://www.disabled-world.com/communication/disabled-dating/advice/partners.php">Different Ways Between How Women and Men Choose Partners</a>: Concordia University research study reveals surprising new evidence about how human males and females choose our partners.

Disabled World provides general information only. Materials presented are never meant to substitute for qualified professional medical care. Any 3rd party offering or advertising does not constitute an endorsement.