Different Ways Between How Women and Men Choose Partners
Author: Concordia University
Published: 2014/05/01 - Updated: 2021/07/25
Topic: Disabled Dating Advice (Publications Database)
Page Content: Synopsis Introduction Main Item
Synopsis: Concordia University research study reveals surprising new evidence about how human males and females choose our partners.
• The researchers tested the framing effect using six key attributes, two of which are more important to men and women respectively, and two that are considered as necessities by both sexes.
• Women also proved more susceptible to framing effects in attributes like ambition and earning potential, while men responded more strongly to framing when physical attractiveness was described.
Introduction
A hamburger that's 90 percent fat-free sounds a lot better than one with 10 percent fat. And even when the choices are the same, humans are hard-wired to prefer the more positive option. This is because of what's known as the "framing effect," a principle that new research from Concordia has proved applies to mate selection, too.
Main Item
The study, co-authored by Concordia marketing professor Gad Saad and Wilfrid Laurier University's Tripat Gill, and published in the journal Evolution and Human Behavior, shows that when we choose a partner, the framing effect is even stronger in women than it is for men.
"When it comes to mate selection, women are more attuned to negatively framed information due to an evolutionary phenomenon called 'parental investment theory,'" says Saad, who has done extensive research on the evolutionary and biological roots of consumer behavior.
"Choosing someone who might be a poor provider or an unloving father would have serious consequences for a woman and for her offspring. So we hypothesized that women would naturally be more leery of negatively framed information when evaluating a prospective mate."
To prove this, Saad and Gill called on hundreds of young men and women to take part in their study. Participants were given positively and negatively framed descriptions of potential partners. For example:
1 - Seven out of 10 people who know this person think that this person is kind. (positive frame)
Versus
2 - Three out of 10 people who know this person think that this person is not kind. (negative frame)
The researchers tested the framing effect using six key attributes, two of which are more important to men and women respectively, and two that are considered as necessities by both sexes:
- Attractive body (more important to men)
- Attractive face (more important to men)
- Earning potential (more important to women)
- Ambition (more important to women)
- Kindness (equally important to both)
- Intelligence (equally important to both)
Participants evaluated both high-quality (e.g. seven out of 10 people think this person is kind) and low-quality (e.g. three out of 10 people think this person is kind) prospective mates for these attributes, in the context of a short-term fling or a long-term relationship.
More often than not, women said they were far less likely to date the potential mates described in the negatively framed descriptions - even though in each instance, they were being presented with exactly the same information as in the positively framed descriptions.
Women also proved more susceptible to framing effects in attributes like ambition and earning potential, while men responded more strongly to framing when physical attractiveness was described.
This research highlights how an evolutionary lens could help explain the biological origins of seemingly "irrational" decision-making biases like the framing effect.
Attribution/Source(s):
This quality-reviewed publication was selected for publishing by the editors of Disabled World due to its significant relevance to the disability community. Originally authored by Concordia University, and published on 2014/05/01 (Edit Update: 2021/07/25), the content may have been edited for style, clarity, or brevity. For further details or clarifications, Concordia University can be contacted at concordia.ca. NOTE: Disabled World does not provide any warranties or endorsements related to this article.
1 - How to Write an Irresistible Online Dating Profile - People feel happier in relationships where they feel like they are being supported - and for that, they have to be known.
2 - Relationships and Fidelity Issues - Communication that is both open and honest is the key to any relationship and certainly in regards to fidelity.
3 - Different Ways Between How Women and Men Choose Partners - Concordia University research study reveals surprising new evidence about how human males and females choose our partners.
Page Information, Citing and Disclaimer
Disabled World is a comprehensive online resource that provides information and news related to disabilities, assistive technologies, and accessibility issues. Founded in 2004 our website covers a wide range of topics, including disability rights, healthcare, education, employment, and independent living, with the goal of supporting the disability community and their families.
Cite This Page (APA): Concordia University. (2014, May 1 - Last revised: 2021, July 25). Different Ways Between How Women and Men Choose Partners. Disabled World. Retrieved December 10, 2024 from www.disabled-world.com/communication/disabled-dating/advice/partners.php
Permalink: <a href="https://www.disabled-world.com/communication/disabled-dating/advice/partners.php">Different Ways Between How Women and Men Choose Partners</a>: Concordia University research study reveals surprising new evidence about how human males and females choose our partners.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, it's important to note that our content is for general informational purposes only. We always recommend consulting qualified healthcare professionals for personalized medical advice. Any 3rd party offering or advertising does not constitute an endorsement.