To Know What They're Saying People Rely on What They Hear
Published : 2014-05-03 - Updated : 2016-11-20
Author : Association for Psychological Science - Contact: psychologicalscience.org
🛈 Synopsis : A study from researchers shows auditory feedback plays an important role in helping us determine what we are saying as we speak.
You know what you're going to say before you say it, right? Not necessarily, research suggests. The study is published in Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
Our results indicate that speakers listen to their own voices to help specify the meaning of what they are saying," says researcher Andreas Lind of Lund University, lead author of the study.
Theories about how we produce speech often assume that we start with a clear, proverbial idea of what to say that goes through different levels of encoding to finally become an utterance.
But the findings from this study support an alternative model in which speech is more than just a dutiful translation of this proverbial message:
"These findings suggest that the meaning of an utterance is not entirely internal to the speaker, but that it is also determined by the feedback we receive from our utterances, and from the inferences we draw from the wider conversational context," Lind explains.
For the study, Lind and colleagues recruited Swedish participants to complete a classic Stroop test, which provided a controlled linguistic setting. During the Stroop test, participants were presented with various color words (e.g., "red" or "green") one at a time on a screen and were tasked with naming the color of the font that each word was printed in, rather than the color that the word itself signified.
The participants wore headphones that provided real-time auditory feedback as they took the test - unbeknown to them, the researchers had rigged the feedback using a voice-triggered playback system. This system allowed the researchers to substitute specific phonologically similar but semantically distinct words ("grey", "green") in real time, a technique they call "Real-time Speech Exchange" or RSE.
Data from the 78 participants indicated that when the timing of the insertions was right, only about one third of the exchanges were detected.
On many of the non-detected trials, when asked to report what they had said, participants reported the word they had heard through feedback, rather than the word they had actually said. Because accuracy on the task was actually very high, the manipulated feedback effectively led participants to believe that they had made an error and said the wrong word.
Overall, Lind and colleagues found that participants accepted the manipulated feedback as having been self-produced on about 85% of the non-detected trials.
Together, these findings suggest that our understanding of our own utterances, and our sense of agency for those utterances, depend to some degree on inferences we make after we've made them.
Most surprising, perhaps, is the fact that while participants received several indications about what they actually said - from their tongue and jaw, from sound conducted through the bone, and from their memory of the correct alternative on the screen- they still treated the manipulated words as though they were self-produced.
This suggests, says Lind, that the effect may be even more pronounced in everyday conversation, which is less constrained and more ambiguous than the context offered by the Stroop test.
"In future studies, we want to apply RSE to situations that are more social and spontaneous - investigating, for example, how exchanged words might influence the way an interview or conversation develops," says Lind.
"While this is technically challenging to execute, it could potentially tell us a great deal about how meaning and communicative intentions are formed in natural discourse," he concludes.
Co-authors on the study include Lars Hall, Bjarn Breidegard, and Christian Balkenius of Lund University and Petter Johansson Lund University and Uppsala University.
This work was supported by Uno Otterstedt's Foundation (Grant EKDO2010/54), the Crafoord Foundation (Grant 20101020), the Swedish Research Council, the Bank of Sweden Tercentenary Foundation, the Pufendorf Institute, and the European Union Goal-Leaders project (Grant FP7 270108).
Related Disability Communication Documents
- 1: Compensation and Kaabil - What's Wrong in a Name? : By bestowing a blind man with hyperability, Sanjay Gupta-directed Kaabil falls in the long list of works that collectively be called compensatory literature.
- 2: I Can't See You - Can You See Me? : Daniel Williams challenges the lack of profile and visibility in the media and fashion industry for people living with visual impairment.
- 3: Conductology: Irish Breakthrough Brings Hope to Kids with Disabilities : Shaun Healy, the first person with severe intellectual disabilities to conduct an orchestra, invented Conductology, a new gesture language for music.
- 4: Do Blind People Characterize Others by Race : What can we learn about that automatic visual processing from people who are unable to see.
- 5: Deaf, Deaf-Blind, Hard of Hearing Domestic Violence Survivors Hotline : CSD, ADWAS and the national coalition are committed to ensuring every deaf, deaf-blind and hard of hearing survivor has access to a deaf advocate who is able to communicate with them directly in American Sign Language.
You're reading Disabled World. Be sure to check out our homepage for further informative disability news, reviews, exclusive stories and how-tos. You can also follow Disabled World on social media sites such as Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn.
Disclaimer: Disabled World provides general information only. Materials presented are in no way meant to be a substitute for professional medical care by a qualified practitioner, nor should they be construed as such. Any 3rd party offering or advertising on disabled-world.com does not constitute endorsement by Disabled World. View our Advertising Policy for further information. Please report outdated or inaccurate information to us.
Journal: Disabled World. Language: English (U.S.). Author: Association for Psychological Science. Electronic Publication Date: 2014-05-03 - Revised: 2016-11-20. Title: To Know What They're Saying People Rely on What They Hear, Source: <a href=https://www.disabled-world.com/communication/rely.php>To Know What They're Saying People Rely on What They Hear</a>. Retrieved 2021-04-11, from https://www.disabled-world.com/communication/rely.php - Reference: DW#210-10293.