To Know What They're Saying People Rely on What They Hear
Author: Association for Psychological Science : Contact: psychologicalscience.org
Published: 2014-05-03 : (Rev. 2016-11-20)
A study from researchers shows auditory feedback plays an important role in helping us determine what we are saying as we speak.
You know what you're going to say before you say it, right? Not necessarily, research suggests. The study is published in Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
Our results indicate that speakers listen to their own voices to help specify the meaning of what they are saying," says researcher Andreas Lind of Lund University, lead author of the study.
Theories about how we produce speech often assume that we start with a clear, proverbial idea of what to say that goes through different levels of encoding to finally become an utterance.
But the findings from this study support an alternative model in which speech is more than just a dutiful translation of this proverbial message:
"These findings suggest that the meaning of an utterance is not entirely internal to the speaker, but that it is also determined by the feedback we receive from our utterances, and from the inferences we draw from the wider conversational context," Lind explains.
For the study, Lind and colleagues recruited Swedish participants to complete a classic Stroop test, which provided a controlled linguistic setting. During the Stroop test, participants were presented with various color words (e.g., "red" or "green") one at a time on a screen and were tasked with naming the color of the font that each word was printed in, rather than the color that the word itself signified.
The participants wore headphones that provided real-time auditory feedback as they took the test - unbeknown to them, the researchers had rigged the feedback using a voice-triggered playback system. This system allowed the researchers to substitute specific phonologically similar but semantically distinct words ("grey", "green") in real time, a technique they call "Real-time Speech Exchange" or RSE.
Data from the 78 participants indicated that when the timing of the insertions was right, only about one third of the exchanges were detected.
On many of the non-detected trials, when asked to report what they had said, participants reported the word they had heard through feedback, rather than the word they had actually said. Because accuracy on the task was actually very high, the manipulated feedback effectively led participants to believe that they had made an error and said the wrong word.
Overall, Lind and colleagues found that participants accepted the manipulated feedback as having been self-produced on about 85% of the non-detected trials.
Together, these findings suggest that our understanding of our own utterances, and our sense of agency for those utterances, depend to some degree on inferences we make after we've made them.
Most surprising, perhaps, is the fact that while participants received several indications about what they actually said - from their tongue and jaw, from sound conducted through the bone, and from their memory of the correct alternative on the screen- they still treated the manipulated words as though they were self-produced.
This suggests, says Lind, that the effect may be even more pronounced in everyday conversation, which is less constrained and more ambiguous than the context offered by the Stroop test.
"In future studies, we want to apply RSE to situations that are more social and spontaneous - investigating, for example, how exchanged words might influence the way an interview or conversation develops," says Lind.
"While this is technically challenging to execute, it could potentially tell us a great deal about how meaning and communicative intentions are formed in natural discourse," he concludes.
Co-authors on the study include Lars Hall, Bjarn Breidegard, and Christian Balkenius of Lund University and Petter Johansson Lund University and Uppsala University.
This work was supported by Uno Otterstedt's Foundation (Grant EKDO2010/54), the Crafoord Foundation (Grant 20101020), the Swedish Research Council, the Bank of Sweden Tercentenary Foundation, the Pufendorf Institute, and the European Union Goal-Leaders project (Grant FP7 270108).
- 1 - Lifeline Discounted Monthly Phone Service : Thomas C. Weiss (2013/11/10)
- 2 - Scott Robertson - H.O.W. (Hell On Wheels) - Signs Agreement with Mirror Image Entertainment Inc. : Da Godfather of Crunk (2020/05/22)
- 3 - Ham Radio Station Connects Retirement Community to World : Guide to Retirement Living Source-Book (2011/09/13)
- 4 - Conductology: Irish Breakthrough Brings Hope to Kids with Disabilities : University of Conductology (2020/03/23)
- 5 - I Can't See You - Can You See Me? : Daniel Williams (2020/02/22)
- 6 - List of Texting Shortcuts for FaceBook - SMS - Chat Rooms : Disabled World (2009/02/02)
- 7 - Cheap Internet for Disabled, Seniors and Low-Income Americans : Disabled World (2018/10/21)
• Disabled World is strictly a news and information website provided for general informational purpose only and does not constitute medical advice. Materials presented are in no way meant to be a substitute for professional medical care by a qualified practitioner, nor should they be construed as such. Any 3rd party offering or advertising on disabled-world.com does not constitute endorsement by Disabled World.
• Please report outdated or inaccurate information to us.