Accessibility in a Virtual World: ADA and Our Personal Responsibility
Topic: Website Accessibility
Author: Timothy K. Giordano, Esq.
Published: 2021/05/20
Contents: Summary - Introduction - Main Item - Related Topics
Synopsis: Eleventh Circuit United States Court issues decision in the area of disability rights: whether a business website is a place of public accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Divergent views on an issue with widespread impact entice the U.S. Supreme Court, especially where the issue is one of important societal concern like disability rights and inclusion. We are all electronic content creators, and ever more so in a COVID world. Often our work is meant for the public at large, including potentially billions with visual impairment among other disabilities.
Introduction
Last week the Eleventh Circuit issued a decision on an important issue in the area of disability rights: whether a business website is a "place of public accommodation" under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Complexities aside the 11th Circuit basically said "no" in a 2-1 decision, as least not for informational websites. Winn Dixie supermarket was therefore not liable to a plaintiff with vision impairment, for a website lacking design features friendly to those who use screen readers.
Main Item
While some courts have taken a similar approach, others have concluded otherwise. Those courts say websites can be places of public accommodation within the ADA, especially where there is a sufficient nexus to the physical business location.
The latest decision is therefore significant because it deepens the split of federal authority on an issue that impacts virtually every ADA-covered business and countless customers with disabilities across the nation. Divergent views on an issue with widespread impact entice the U.S. Supreme Court, especially where the issue is one of important societal concern like disability rights and inclusion. It remains to be seen whether the high court will get involved and if so, when.
What is Our Personal Responsibility?
The Court's decision raised for me an important question outside the law. We are all electronic content creators, and ever more so in a COVID world. Often our work is meant for the public at large, including potentially billions with visual impairment among other disabilities. Even after COVID is relegated to that dustbin of History labeled "the Worst," most believe our virtual world is here to stay.
Against this backdrop, what is our personal responsibility and opportunity to make these online "interactions" more inclusive? That's not a novel inquiry, but it's one I've ignored for far too long. But now that I'm properly paying attention, I see there are easy things I should have been doing all along. Let's take a look at just a few examples.
Accessible Fonts, Text Justification, Hyperlinks & Images
The most basic and intuitive example first:
Font size. The standard 12pt is ideal, and 9pt is the absolute bottom limit according to accessibility standards published by Penn State University. I've gone lower than ideal a lot, and below the absolute bottom on PowerPoint for sure. While I knew this was a bad look by any measure, I failed to understand it also risked excluding people based on disability.
There are less intuitive fixes that seem just as easy. For example, authorities on accessibility universally say we should avoid "center justification" because it makes text more difficult to read for people with dyslexia. Left justification is best, as are sans-serif fonts such as Arial and Verdana. Similarly, "fancy" fonts can pose a challenge for those with a vision impairment.
Another place to be mindful is hyperlinks:
They should be in bold to be more detectable to those with color-based vision challenges. We should also strive to use the destination title itself on the hyperlink, as it's more friendly for screen-reading devices than something generic like "click here."
A great resource from Microsoft is titled "Make your Word documents accessible to people with disabilities." Among several recommendations is one to add "alternative text" to images, or a descriptive caption. People who use screen readers can then understand what is being depicted. Something so simple like that means it could take just two seconds to be more inclusive.
A Good Start, Lots More to Do
Obviously there is a lot more to be done than to change our fonts, slap a caption on a photo and congratulate ourselves, and much more to doing accessibility well. I'm just coming to scratch the surface on all this personally. But my mindset is changing. I developed this jaded view each morning throughout COVID stumbling to my computer thinking, "It's a Virtual World, I'm just logging into it." But what am I implicitly bemoaning at all? I can engage in a virtual world unencumbered, many can't, and I can do something to help. Going forward I therefore hope to log in more mindfully and to E-engage in the manner that someone who says they care about diversity should. After all, words without action is no better than a pig in lipstick - still really ugly.
About the Author
Timothy K. Giordano, Esq. has been active in the private practice and business of law since 2002. He has served as a Trustee for the American Conference on Diversity and as a member of its Executive Committee. He also teaches in the School of Communication and Media at Montclair State University.
Attribution/Source(s):
This quality-reviewed publication was selected for publishing by the editors of Disabled World due to its significant relevance to the disability community. Originally authored by Timothy K. Giordano, Esq., and published on 2021/05/20, the content may have been edited for style, clarity, or brevity. For further details or clarifications, Timothy K. Giordano, Esq. can be contacted at Contact Details. NOTE: Disabled World does not provide any warranties or endorsements related to this article.
Page Information, Citing and Disclaimer
Disabled World is a comprehensive online resource that provides information and news related to disabilities, assistive technologies, and accessibility issues. Founded in 2004 our website covers a wide range of topics, including disability rights, healthcare, education, employment, and independent living, with the goal of supporting the disability community and their families.
Cite This Page (APA): Timothy K. Giordano, Esq.. (2021, May 20). Accessibility in a Virtual World: ADA and Our Personal Responsibility. Disabled World. Retrieved September 19, 2024 from www.disabled-world.com/disability/accessibility/websitedesign/public-accommodation.php
Permalink: <a href="https://www.disabled-world.com/disability/accessibility/websitedesign/public-accommodation.php">Accessibility in a Virtual World: ADA and Our Personal Responsibility</a>: Eleventh Circuit United States Court issues decision in the area of disability rights: whether a business website is a place of public accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
Disabled World provides general information only. Materials presented are never meant to substitute for qualified medical care. Any 3rd party offering or advertising does not constitute an endorsement.