Diallo's Nightclub Sued: Fired Employee for Not Providing HIV Test Result
Author: U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
Published: 2017/01/09 - Updated: 2018/07/01
Topic: Disability Discrimination (Publications Database)
Page Content: Synopsis Introduction Main Item
Synopsis: EEOC charged Diallos violated federal law when it forced employee to provide medical documentation to prove she was not HIV-positive, then fired her when she failed to provide documentation.
Introduction
Houston Diallo's Nightclub to Pay $139,366 to Resolve EEOC Disability Discrimination Lawsuit - EEOC charged Diallos violated federal law when it forced employee to provide medical documentation to prove she was not HIV-positive, then fired her when she failed to provide documentation.
Main Item
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) announced today that Diallo's of Houston, a Houston-area nightclub and party venue, will pay $139,366 and furnish other relief as a result of an EEOC disability discrimination lawsuit.
In its lawsuit, EEOC charged that Diallo's violated federal law when it forced employee Felicia M. Parks to provide medical documentation to prove she was not HIV-positive, and then fired her when she failed to provide such documentation.
EEOC charged that Diallo's owner/manager approached Parks and informed her that she had "heard" from an unidentified third party that Parks was HIV-positive.
The owner/manager twice demanded that Parks provide documentation to show she was not HIV-positive, based only on the owner/manager's assumption that Parks' HIV status was hazardous to the company's business.
The owner/manager then fired Parks when she did not provide the required documentation.
Such alleged conduct violates the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
EEOC filed its lawsuit in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division against Diallo's Entertainment, Inc. dba Diallo's of Houston (Civil Action No. 4:16-cv-02909) after first attempting to reach a pre-litigation settlement through its conciliation process.
On Dec. 29, 2016, Judge David Hittner entered default judgment against Diallo's. EEOC was granted judgment following its presentation of evidence in court, and obtained an award for the affected employee of $139,366.
The court awarded all the relief sought by EEOC, including $89,366 in back pay and other pecuniary losses to Parks, plus compensatory damages for her mental pain and suffering and punitive damages totaling an additional $50,000.
The court also granted EEOC's requested injunctive relief prohibiting Diallo's from engaging in future disability discrimination, and ordered that the nightclub institute policies, practices and programs to ensure equal employment opportunities for qualified persons with disabilities.
The court also awarded EEOC its court costs.
"It is a violation of federal law to make a disability-related inquiry unrelated to the employee's job requirements or to any legitimate business necessity," explained EEOC's regional attorney in Houston, Rudy Sustaita. "EEOC will keep fighting such invasive and unfair probing by employers."
The attorney in charge of the case, EEOC Senior Trial Attorney Connie Wilhite Gatlin, added;
"Employers may no longer rely on outdated and meritless assumptions about HIV to discriminate against employees. A demand for disability-related information without any legitimate reason is simply illegal."
EEOC's Houston District Office is located on the sixth floor of the Leland Federal Building at 1919 Smith St. in Houston.
EEOC advances opportunity in the workplace by enforcing federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination. More information is available at www.eeoc.gov
Attribution/Source(s):
This quality-reviewed publication was selected for publishing by the editors of Disabled World due to its significant relevance to the disability community. Originally authored by U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), and published on 2017/01/09 (Edit Update: 2018/07/01), the content may have been edited for style, clarity, or brevity. For further details or clarifications, U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) can be contacted at eeoc.gov. NOTE: Disabled World does not provide any warranties or endorsements related to this article.
Explore Similar Topics
1 - Bias in Health Care Study Reveals Discrimination Toward Children With Disability - Study reveals children with disabilities, and their families, may face discrimination in the hospitals and clinics they visit for their health care.
2 - List of the 30 UDHR Basic Human Rights - List of the 30 basic human rights according to Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) by United Nations (UN) signed in Paris on 10 December 1948.
3 - Are Human Rights a Thing of the Past? - Recently, scholars have expressed doubt that the language of human rights still animates the global fight for better living conditions.
Complete Publications Database
Page Information, Citing and Disclaimer
Disabled World is a comprehensive online resource that provides information and news related to disabilities, assistive technologies, and accessibility issues. Founded in 2004 our website covers a wide range of topics, including disability rights, healthcare, education, employment, and independent living, with the goal of supporting the disability community and their families.
Cite This Page (APA): U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). (2017, January 9 - Last revised: 2018, July 1). Diallo's Nightclub Sued: Fired Employee for Not Providing HIV Test Result. Disabled World. Retrieved December 7, 2024 from www.disabled-world.com/disability/discrimination/diallos-eeoc.php
Permalink: <a href="https://www.disabled-world.com/disability/discrimination/diallos-eeoc.php">Diallo's Nightclub Sued: Fired Employee for Not Providing HIV Test Result</a>: EEOC charged Diallos violated federal law when it forced employee to provide medical documentation to prove she was not HIV-positive, then fired her when she failed to provide documentation.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, it's important to note that our content is for general informational purposes only. We always recommend consulting qualified healthcare professionals for personalized medical advice. Any 3rd party offering or advertising does not constitute an endorsement.