DOJ Sues Apartment Developer for Disability Discrimination
Author: U.S. Department of Justice Office of Public Affairs
Published: 2019/05/10 - Updated: 2026/02/08
Publication Type: Announcement
Category Topic: Laws and Rights - Related Publications
Page Content: Synopsis - Introduction - Main - Insights, Updates
Synopsis: This announcement details a significant federal civil rights enforcement action filed by the U.S. Department of Justice against Miller-Valentine Operations Inc. and affiliated entities for allegedly violating the Fair Housing Act and Americans with Disabilities Act across 82 multifamily housing complexes in 13 states. The official government complaint, sourced directly from the DOJ Office of Public Affairs, provides crucial information for disability rights advocates, housing professionals, and people with disabilities seeking accessible housing by documenting specific accessibility barriers including inaccessible entrances, bathrooms, kitchens, and pedestrian routes. The lawsuit affects over 3,000 housing units and seeks both compliance with federal accessibility standards and compensation for those harmed, making this information particularly valuable for disability community members and fair housing organizations tracking systemic accessibility violations in federally-funded housing developments - Disabled World (DW).
Introduction
Multi-State Lawsuit Claims Apartment Owners, Developers Discriminated Against Disabled
The Department of Justice and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Ohio today announced the filing of a lawsuit against Ohio-based Miller-Valentine Operations Inc. and affiliated companies, owners, developers and builders of 82 multifamily housing complexes located in Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas and West Virginia.
The lawsuit alleges that the defendants failed to design and construct housing units and related facilities to make them accessible to persons with disabilities in compliance with the Fair Housing Act (FHA) and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The 82 complexes contain more than 3,000 units that are required by the FHA to have accessible features, and most contain public spaces that are required to comply with the ADA.
Main Content
According to the government's complaint, the defendants built many of the complexes with the assistance of federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credits or with the financial assistance of other federal government programs.
"For over two decades federal laws have required multifamily housing complexes to be built with accessible features," said Assistant Attorney General Eric Dreiband. "The Department of Justice is committed to protecting the rights of persons with disabilities to equal access to housing opportunities, including accessible dwellings and related facilities."
"We're in the business of enforcing federal civil rights laws to their fullest extent," said U.S. Attorney Glassman. "It doesn't matter to us whether the defendant is an individual in a single neighborhood or, as here, a company operating in many states. The complaint that the United States filed today alleges not only that Miller-Valentine designed and built multi-family housing complexes that are not accessible to people with disabilities, but also that Miller-Valentine took public money to build those complexes and yet still built them such that some citizens wouldn't be able to live there."
The lawsuit, which was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, alleges that the 82 properties have significant accessibility barriers, including steps leading to building entrances; non-existent or excessively sloped pedestrian routes from apartment units to site amenities (e.g., picnic areas, dumpsters, clubhouse/leasing offices); inaccessible parking; inaccessible bathrooms and kitchens; inaccessible door hardware; and insufficient maneuvering space at unit entrances and entrances to common use areas that make those entrances inaccessible to many people with disabilities.
The lawsuit seeks an order;
- Requiring the defendants to bring the properties into compliance with the FHA and the ADA.
- Prohibiting the defendants from designing or constructing future residential properties in a manner that discriminates against persons with disabilities.
- Requiring the defendants to pay monetary damages to persons harmed by the lack of accessibility and civil penalties to the United States to vindicate the public interest.
The Complexes at Issue
Illinois
- Twin Lakes Senior Villas, Rantoul, IL
Indiana
- Honey Creek, Greenwood, IN
- Mill Pond, Muncie, IN
- Summit Pointe, Lawrenceburg, IN
- Waterbury Apartments, Decatur, IN
Iowa
- Meadow Vista Senior Villas, Altoona, IA
Kansas
- Galena Estates, Galena, KS
Kentucky
- Weaver Farm Apartments, Florence, KY
Missouri
- Hampshire Landing, Joplin, MO
North Carolina
- Madison Place Senior, Gastonia, NC
- Pinecrest Apartments, Walkertown, NC
- River Crossing, Charlotte, NC
- The Enclave at Winston-Salem, Winston-Salem, NC
- The Landings at Steele Creek I, Charlotte, NC
- The Landings at Steele Creek II, Charlotte, NC
- Twin Cedars I, Hickory, NC
- Twin Cedars II, Hickory, NC
- Villas at Twin Cedars, Hickory, NC
Ohio
- Aspen Grove Apartments, Middletown, OH
- Bent Tree Apartments I, Piqua, OH
- Bent Tree Apartments II, Piqua, OH
- Breckenridge Apartments, Findlay, OH
- Bridge Street Landing, Chillicothe, OH
- Brookdale Trillium Crossing, Columbus, OH
- Brookstone Apartments, Bellefontaine, OH
- Carriage Trails Senior Villas, Huber Heights, OH
- Cedar Trail, Bellbrook, OH
- Cedar Wood Apartments, Mansfield, OH
- Cobblegate Square Apartments, Moraine, OH
- Deerfield Crossing, Lebanon, OH
- Eagles Point Apartments, Kenton, OH
- Faith Community Housing, Crestline, OH
- Fox Run, Trotwood, OH
- Glen Arbors Apartments, Napoleon, OH
- Harbour Cove Apartments, Cincinnati, OH
- Harmony Senior Village, Williamsburg, OH
- Holly Hills Apartments, Jackson, OH
- Hoover Place, Dayton, OH
- Hunter's Oak Apartments, Greenville, OH
- Indian Trace I, Oxford, OH
- Indian Trace II, Oxford, OH
- Lake Towne Senior, Walbridge, OH
- Lofts at Hoover, Dayton, OH
- Lofts at One West High Street, Oxford, OH
- Lyons Place I, Dayton, OH
- Lyons Place II, Dayton, OH
- Mallard Glen, Amelia, OH
- Mallard Landing, Marion, OH
- Meadow Creek Apartments, Bryan, OH
- Meadow View South, Springboro, OH
- Oak Wood Apartments, Lexington, OH
- Pheasant Run Senior, Dayton, OH
- Pine Ridge, Logan, OH
- Quail Run Apartments, Van Wert, OH
- Queen Esther's Village, Canton, OH
- Riverside Landing at Delaware Place, Delaware, OH
- Riverview Bluffs, New Richmond, OH
- Sandhurst, Zanesville, OH
- Scioto Woods I, Chillicothe, OH
- Scioto Woods II, Chillicothe, OH
- Siena Village Senior Living, Dayton, OH
- Bernard Commons, St. Bernard, OH
- Rita's Senior Housing, Garfield Heights, OH
- Stone Creek Apartments, Moraine, OH
- Sycamore Creek Apartments, Sidney, OH
- Timber Glen II, Batavia, OH
- Timber Ridge Apartments, Dayton, OH
- Timberlake Apartments, Vandalia, OH
- Walnut Run Senior Villas, Cortland, OH
- Waterstone Landing, Perrysburg, OH
- Whitehouse Square Senior Villas, Whitehouse, OH
- Wind Ridge Apartments, Tipp City, OH
- Windsor Place, Beavercreek, OH
- Wright Place Apartments, Xenia, OH
Oklahoma
- Fairway Breeze Apartments, El Reno, OK
- Reserve at Spencer, Spencer, OK
Pennsylvania
- Allegheny Pointe, Apollo, PA
- Walkers Ridge Apartments, Greensburg, PA
Texas
- Gallatin Park Apartments, Gallatin, TX
- Oak Ridge Apartments, Nolanville, TX
- Silversage Point at Western Center, Fort Worth, TX
West Virginia
- Reserve at Oak Spring, Clarksburg, WV
Anyone with information about the inaccessible conditions at these properties should call the Department of Justice.
The FHA prohibits discrimination in housing based on disability, race, color, religion, national origin, sex and familial status. Among other things, it requires all multifamily housing constructed after March 13, 1991, to have basic accessibility features, including accessible routes without steps or steep slopes to all ground-floor units. Enacted in 1990, the ADA requires, among other things, that places of public accommodation - such as rental offices - at multifamily housing complexes designed and constructed for first occupancy after Jan. 26, 1993, be accessible to persons with disabilities.
The complaint contains allegations of unlawful conduct; the allegations must be proven in court.
Insights, Analysis, and Developments
Editorial Note: The magnitude of this case underscores a troubling reality in housing development: despite clear federal accessibility requirements in place for over two decades, builders continue to construct barriers that exclude people with disabilities from housing opportunities. What makes this lawsuit particularly significant is not just the scale - 82 complexes spanning 13 states - but the fact that many received federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credits, meaning taxpayer dollars subsidized the construction of housing that violates the very laws designed to protect equal access. As this litigation moves forward, it serves as a critical reminder that accessibility compliance remains unevenly enforced in multifamily housing development, and that vigilant oversight and enforcement actions remain essential to ensuring that the promise of equal housing opportunity becomes reality rather than remaining merely aspirational - Disabled World (DW).Attribution/Source(s): This quality-reviewed publication was selected for publishing by the editors of Disabled World (DW) due to its relevance to the disability community. Originally authored by U.S. Department of Justice Office of Public Affairs and published on 2019/05/10, this content may have been edited for style, clarity, or brevity.