Disability Based Housing Discrimination Settlement Against Valley View Apartments

Topic: Lawyers and Rights
Author: U.S. Department of Justice
Published: 2009/08/05 - Updated: 2024/06/01
Publication Type: Announcement
Contents: Summary - Introduction - Main Item - Related Topics

Synopsis: Individuals with disabilities have the basic right to expect reasonable accommodations that allow them access to housing. This settlement is a significant award for a case involving housing discrimination against a lone individual, and it should send a strong message to landlords that they must take all requests for reasonable accommodations very seriously. The lawsuit originated from charges filed by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) on behalf of a tenant of Valley View Apartments.

Introduction

Individuals with disabilities have the basic right to expect reasonable accommodations that allow them access to housing. This settlement is a significant award for a case involving housing discrimination against a lone individual, and it should send a strong message to landlords that they must take all requests for reasonable accommodations very seriously.

Main Item

The Justice Department has announced an agreement with the former owners and managers of Valley View Apartments in Longview, Wash., to settle allegations that they violated the Fair Housing Act by intentionally discriminating against an individual with a disability. Under the settlement, which must be approved by the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington, the defendants must pay a total of $35,000 to the complainant.

The lawsuit originated from charges filed by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) on behalf of a tenant of Valley View Apartments.

In 2004, the tenant, who has a mobility impairment that limits his ability to enter or exit a car, asked to use two contiguous parking spaces in the apartment complex's lot until a handicap accessible space became available. The complaint alleged that the former owners and managers of the apartments, John E. and Shirley L. Price, violated the Fair Housing Act when they intentionally discriminated against the tenant by refusing his request and by initiating retaliatory eviction proceedings.

The complaint also alleged that the tenant's request was reasonable and necessary to afford him an equal opportunity to use and enjoy his dwelling.

"Individuals with disabilities have the basic right to expect reasonable accommodations that allow them access to housing. This settlement is a significant award for a case involving housing discrimination against a lone individual, and it should send a strong message to landlords that they must take all requests for reasonable accommodations very seriously," said Acting Assistant Attorney General Loretta King of the Civil Rights Division.

"The fact that people continue to be denied housing in the 21st century because of their disability is unacceptable," said John Trasvina, Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity. "This conduct has been illegal for more than 20 years, and we intend to enforce the full extent of the law."

The federal Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination in housing based on race, color, religion, national origin, sex, disability or familial status. Individuals who believe that they may have been victims of housing discrimination can call the Housing Discrimination Tip Line (1-800-896-7743), e-mail the Justice Department at fairhousing@usdoj.gov or contact the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development at 1-800-669-9777.

Attribution/Source(s):

This quality-reviewed publication was selected for publishing by the editors of Disabled World due to its significant relevance to the disability community. Originally authored by U.S. Department of Justice, and published on 2009/08/05 (Edit Update: 2024/06/01), the content may have been edited for style, clarity, or brevity. For further details or clarifications, U.S. Department of Justice can be contacted at justice.gov. NOTE: Disabled World does not provide any warranties or endorsements related to this article.

Explore Related Topics

1 - - Supreme Court of NYS denies MTA and the NYC Transit Authority motion to dismiss its case for Equal Fare Discounts, ruling in favor of the plaintiffs.

2 - - Youth with intellectual disabilities held in psychiatric unit for over a year receives appropriate housing services from state agency after disability advocates resolve civil rights lawsuit.

3 - - Class action lawsuit filed against DOCCS and OMH for illegally subjecting incarcerated New Yorkers with disabilities to solitary confinement in NYS prisons.

4 - - A number of disability groups file motion to prevent New York City from shirking its obligation to provide wheelchair-accessible taxis.

5 - - Disability Rights California and Disability Rights Advocates investigation finds deficient and discriminatory conditions at Kings County Juvenile Detention Center.

Complete List of Related Information

Page Information, Citing and Disclaimer

Disabled World is a comprehensive online resource that provides information and news related to disabilities, assistive technologies, and accessibility issues. Founded in 2004 our website covers a wide range of topics, including disability rights, healthcare, education, employment, and independent living, with the goal of supporting the disability community and their families.

Cite This Page (APA): U.S. Department of Justice. (2009, August 5 - Last revised: 2024, June 1). Disability Based Housing Discrimination Settlement Against Valley View Apartments. Disabled World. Retrieved October 7, 2024 from www.disabled-world.com/disability/legal/disability-housing-discrimination.php

Permalink: <a href="https://www.disabled-world.com/disability/legal/disability-housing-discrimination.php">Disability Based Housing Discrimination Settlement Against Valley View Apartments</a>: Individuals with disabilities have the basic right to expect reasonable accommodations that allow them access to housing.

Disabled World provides general information only. Materials presented are never meant to substitute for qualified medical care. Any 3rd party offering or advertising does not constitute an endorsement.