ASD Special Education Disputes: Income and Child Behavior
Author: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Published: 2015/01/17 - Updated: 2026/05/18
Publication Type: Informative
Contents: Synopsis - Definition - Introduction - Main - Insights, Updates - Related Publications
Synopsis: This research, published in the Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, draws on a web survey of more than 500 parents across 47 states and Washington, D.C. to identify factors associated with parents' use of procedural safeguards under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act when they disagree with schools about services for children with autism spectrum disorder. Conducted by Meghan M. Burke of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and Samantha E. Goldman of Vanderbilt University's Peabody College, the study found that families whose children spend less than 20 percent of their time in mainstream classrooms were nearly twice as likely to pursue mediation or due process hearings, that more than 26 percent of surveyed parents had already done so, and that households earning above 100,000 dollars were significantly more likely to take legal action than those earning roughly half as much - a gap the researchers describe as worrisome given an estimated 60,000 dollar average cost per due process hearing. The paper also reports associations with parent-school partnership strength and with internalizing behaviors such as withdrawal and anxiety. The findings are useful for parents of children with ASD, special education advocates, school administrators, and disability rights attorneys working to make procedural protections more equitable.
- Topic Definition: Legal Disputes About Children with ASD
Legal disputes about children with autism spectrum disorder refer to formal disagreements between parents and public school systems over the identification, placement, services, or programming provided to a student with ASD under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, typically resolved through procedural safeguards such as mediation, due process hearings, complaint investigations, or, where necessary, civil litigation. These disputes commonly center on issues like the proportion of time a child spends in mainstream classrooms, the adequacy of behavioral and therapeutic supports, and the appropriateness of an Individualized Education Program, and research has linked their frequency to factors including restrictive placements, family income, the strength of parent-school relationships, and the child's behavioral profile.
Introduction
Legal Disputes About Kids with ASD: Family Income and Child Behavior
Families whose children with autism spectrum disorders spend less than 20 percent of their time in mainstream classrooms are nearly twice as likely to resort to litigation, such as filing for due process hearings or mediation, when they disagree with school officials about their children's education, according to a recent survey of parents.
The Web survey, which gathered responses from more than 500 parents in 47 states and Washington, D.C., examined characteristics of children with ASD, their families and family-school relationships to identify factors that might predict parents' utilization of procedural safeguards to protect their and their children's rights.
Main Content
More than 26 percent of parents who participated in the survey reported they had filed for mediation or due process hearings, two procedural safeguards that are available to them under the Americans with Disabilities Education Act.
However, families with incomes above $100,000 were significantly more likely to take legal recourse compared with families who earned half as much, a disparity that special education researcher Meghan M. Burke of the University of Illinois called "very worrisome."
"That's a huge problem, to see that parents who come from low-income backgrounds have less access to these safeguards," said Burke, who conducted the research with Samantha E. Goldman of Vanderbilt University's Peabody College. "Due process and mediation are definitely last resorts for parents and schools to resolve their differences, but you want it to be an equitable resort. The playing field needs to be leveled so that lower-income families have access to pro bono and sliding-scale attorneys who can help them file, if that's something that they need to do."
Compared with peers who have other disabilities, disproportionate numbers of students with ASD wind up at the center of litigation because their parents and schools disagree about placement or other aspects of their education, Burke said.
While legal proceedings can be effective in helping parents and schools resolve disagreements, the average cost of a due process hearing is estimated to be $60,000 - an option beyond the financial means of many parents, especially low- or middle-income families whose pocketbooks may already be strained by out-of-pocket expenditures for educational and behavioral supports for their children with ASD.
Burke and Goldman also found links between the strength of parent-school partnerships and greater use of mediation or due process. However, Burke said long-term studies are needed to determine causality - whether parents who have great partnerships with schools are less likely to file due process, or if these relationships are eroded when parents seek the help of judges or hearing officers to resolve disputes.
Children who engaged in more internalizing behaviors, such as being withdrawn or anxious, were at greater risk of becoming involved in due process or mediation proceedings as well, the researchers found.
"These kids can easily fly under the radar, as opposed to children who engage in externalizing behaviors, such as physical and verbal aggression," Burke said. "This should shed some light on how we need to make sure these kids are being served appropriately."
The paper was published recently in the Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.
Insights, Analysis, and Developments
Editorial Note: The pattern documented here points to a familiar but under addressed equity problem in special education - the legal tools designed to protect every child's right to an appropriate education are realistically available only to families who can afford the attorneys and expert witnesses needed to use them. For children whose autism presents through internalizing behaviors like anxiety and withdrawal, the risk of being underserved is compounded, since their needs are often less visible to teachers and administrators than more disruptive presentations. Expanding access to pro bono representation, sliding-scale legal services, and earlier collaborative dispute resolution would help ensure that the safeguards written into federal law function for all families and not only those with the means to invoke them.Attribution/Source(s): This quality-reviewed publication was selected for publishing by the editors of Disabled World (DW) due to its relevance to the disability community. Originally authored by University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and published on 2015/01/17, this content may have been edited for style, clarity, or brevity.