Print Page

EEOC Sues Princeton Healthcare System for Disability Discrimination

Published: 2010-08-14
Author: U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Peer-Reviewed: N/A
Related Papers: Latest Items - Full List

On This Page: Summary - Main Article

Synopsis: Federal Agency Says Health Care Provider Unlawfully Fired Employees Who Needed Medical Leave. Federal Agency Says Health Care Provider Unlawfully Fired Employees Who Needed Medical Leave.

Main Digest

Federal Agency Says Health Care Provider Unlawfully Fired Employees Who Needed Medical Leave.


Princeton HealthCare System, which operates a hospital and provides other health care services, violated federal law by failing to reasonably accommodate the needs of its employees who needed medical leave, and then firing them because of their disabilities, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charged in a lawsuit it filed today.

According to the EEOC's suit, Princeton HealthCare System enforces leave policies that do not provide reasonable accommodations to qualified individuals with a disability. Princeton HealthCare fires employees who are not qualified for leave under the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) if they cannot return to work within seven days, and refuses to grant leave beyond the 12 weeks allowed by the FMLA. Princeton HealthCare System does not grant exceptions to these policies for qualified individuals with disabilities who need additional leave as a reasonable accommodation.

Such alleged conduct violates the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA), which requires that employers must provide reasonable accommodations to employees with disabilities unless it would cause an undue hardship to the employer. A leave of absence is a form of reasonable accommodation.

More than a dozen employees with disabilities who requested a leave of absence as a reasonable accommodation were denied leave and were fired by Princeton HealthCare. The EEOC filed suit ( EEOC v. Princeton HealthCare System ) in U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey after first attempting to reach a pre-litigation settlement through its conciliation process.

"The goal of the ADA is to provide equal employment opportunities for qualified individuals with disabilities," said Spencer H. Lewis, Jr., director of the EEOC's New York District Office. "The unfortunate reality is that too many companies discriminate against persons with disabilities by strictly applying blanket leave policies."

Rosemary DiSavino, the EEOC trial attorney who will be litigating this case, said, "This lawsuit sends a message to employers that inflexible leave policies which ignore reasonable accommodations that will make it possible to get employees back on the job are illegal. The EEOC will seek full relief for qualified employees with disabilities who are harmed by the application of these types of policies."

Princeton HealthCare System operates University Medical Center at Princeton and related health care facilities in Mercer County.

The EEOC enforces federal laws prohibiting discrimination in employment. Further information about the Commission is available on its web site at

Share This Information To:
𝕏.com Facebook Reddit

Discover Related Topics:


Disabled World is an independent disability community founded in 2004 to provide disability news and information to people with disabilities, seniors, their family and/or carers. See our homepage for informative reviews, exclusive stories and how-tos. You can connect with us on social media such as and our Facebook page.

Permalink: <a href="">EEOC Sues Princeton Healthcare System for Disability Discrimination</a>

Cite This Page (APA): U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2010, August 14). EEOC Sues Princeton Healthcare System for Disability Discrimination. Disabled World. Retrieved September 21, 2023 from

Disabled World provides general information only. The materials presented are never meant to substitute for qualified professional medical care, nor should they be construed as such. Funding is derived from advertisements or referral programs. Any 3rd party offering or advertising does not constitute an endorsement.