Disability Benefits and Injured Colorado Workers Taxability

Ian C. Langtree - Writer/Editor for Disabled World (DW)
Published: 2011/06/06 - Updated: 2024/02/25
Publication Type: Informative
Category Topic: Tax Information - Academic Publications

Page Content: Synopsis - Introduction - Main

Synopsis: Colorado injured workers who are potentially eligible for both workers compensation and Social Security disability benefits may face tax implications. The case that addressed this issue is Sherar v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. The U.S. Tax Court decided the case on April 6th. The court held that certain workers' compensation benefits were taxable as Social Security benefits under section 86(d)(3) of the tax code.

Introduction

In light of the recent Sherar decision, injured workers who are potentially eligible for both workers' compensation and Social Security disability benefits may face tax implications.

Main Content

Injured workers face many challenges. The pain of being injured and the need to recover from the injury are already a lot to deal with. Financial uncertainty is also a factor, as many workers experience the anxiety of not knowing how they'll be able to cover all of their bills without a regular paycheck.

Workers' compensation and Social Security disability benefits are supposed to ease that financial strain. But those benefits don't always stretch as far as an injured worker really needs them to. For that reason, a recent decision by the U.S. Tax Court on whether workers' compensation benefits can be excluded from taxable income is of significant concern.

The case that addressed this issue is Sherar v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. The U.S. Tax Court decided the case on April 6th. The court held that certain workers' compensation benefits were taxable as Social Security benefits under section 86(d)(3) of the tax code.

Facts of Sherar Case

Linda Sherar suffered not one but two work-related injuries in 1998. The injuries occurred only two months apart. She underwent a total of 12 surgeries and started receiving workers' compensation in 1999.

Four years later, in 2003, she applied for Social Security disability benefits. Though Mrs. Sherar's application was initially denied, she was eventually successful on appeal and started receiving Social Security Disability Income (SSDI) in 2007.

On the Social Security Benefit Statement (Form SSA-1099) that Mrs. Sherar received from the Social Security Administration, SSA noted a "workers' compensation offset." But Sherar did not report any Social Security benefits as income.

The Internal Revenue Service asserted, however, that 85 percent of the Social Security benefits Mrs. Sherar received in 2007 should have been included in gross income on the joint tax return she and her husband filed.

The Tax Court's Reasoning

In its written opinion in the Sherar case, the U.S. Tax Court acknowledged that the general rule that "workers' compensation is generally excluded from a taxpayer's gross income." But the court went on to note that Social Security disability benefits "may be included in a taxpayer's gross income pursuant to a statutory formula."

This formula involves several factors, including:

• Amount received in Social Security benefits
• Other income of the taxpayer
• Filing status

The court further noted that, under section 86(d)(3) of the tax code, the amount of Social Security benefits may include the amount of workers' compensation benefits received.

More specifically, this means that "if the amount of Social Security benefits that a taxpayer receives is reduced because of the receipt of workers' compensation benefits," there will be what is usually called an "offset." With an offset, "the amount of workers' compensation benefits that causes the reduction... is treated as though it were a Social Security benefit."

The court recognized that if Mrs. Sherar had not applied for Social Security benefits her workers' compensation would not have been subject to federal tax. The court nonetheless concluded that under the tax code the amount by which her Social Security benefits were reduced by workers' compensation benefits (i.e., the "offset" amount) must be considered to be a Social Security benefit - and is therefore taxable.

Implications of the Decision

Clearly, in light of the Sherar decision, injured workers who are potentially eligible for both workers' compensation and Social Security disability benefits should weigh their decision closely. The fact that the workers' compensation "offset" amount is now held to be a taxable Social Security benefit means those benefits will not stretch as far as they used to for injured workers who receive both types of benefits.

Role of Colorado Law

It should be noted that the Sherar decision applies only to federal tax law. Colorado is one of only a few states in which, by statute, workers' compensation offsets for one-half of SSDI benefits. For this reason, the tax ruling may not apply to those receiving workers compensation benefits under Colorado law.

Author Credentials: Ian is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of Disabled World, a leading resource for news and information on disability issues. With a global perspective shaped by years of travel and lived experience, Ian is a committed proponent of the Social Model of Disability-a transformative framework developed by disabled activists in the 1970s that emphasizes dismantling societal barriers rather than focusing solely on individual impairments. His work reflects a deep commitment to disability rights, accessibility, and social inclusion. To learn more about Ian's background, expertise, and accomplishments, visit his full biography.