Blind Passenger Sues Uber for Dragging Her and Service Dog Down the Street
Topic: Lawyers and Rights
Author: Washington Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs
Published: 2016/06/03 - Updated: 2024/04/17
Publication Type: Announcement
Contents: Summary - Introduction - Main - Related
Synopsis: Federal law requires Uber to treat blind customers equally and accommodate their service animals. As alleged in the Complaint, during that incident, the Uber driver who agreed to transport Ms. Jolliff yelled that dog is not allowed in the car and drove off. Not only did Uber's driver refuse to provide Uber's service to Ms. Jolliff and Railey, but the complaint also alleges that the Uber driver drove away while Ms. Jolliff was attempting to enter the car. As a result, Ms. Jolliff was dragged several feet, tripped, and suffered injuries.
Introduction
The Washington Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs (the "Committee") and Gilbert LLP have filed today a lawsuit in federal district court in the Eastern District of Virginia on behalf of Tiffany Jolliff against Uber, alleging violations of the Americans With Disabilities Act ("ADA") and the Virginians with Disabilities Act ("VDA") for Uber's unlawful refusal to accommodate Ms. Jolliff, a blind passenger, and her service dog, Railey, and for injuring them in the process.
Main Digest
The Complaint alleges that Ms. Jolliff, who works as a policy specialist for the federal government on employment for workers with disabilities, has been repeatedly discriminated against and denied Uber's services when Uber's drivers have seen that she is accompanied by her service dog Railey. Specifically, instead of accommodating her service dog Railey, as both the ADA and VDA require, Uber drivers have repeatedly driven off upon seeing that Ms. Jolliff had a service dog.
The lawsuit, Jolliff v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al., arises from a June 14, 2015 incident that resulted in injury to Ms. Jolliff. As alleged in the Complaint, during that incident, the Uber driver who agreed to transport Ms. Jolliff yelled "that dog" is not allowed in the car and drove off. Not only did Uber's driver refuse to provide Uber's service to Ms. Jolliff and Railey, but the complaint also alleges that the Uber driver drove away while Ms. Jolliff was attempting to enter the car. As a result, Ms. Jolliff was dragged several feet, tripped, and suffered injuries.
"Imagine waiting for an Uber, which is supposed to be a quick, convenient way to travel, and repeatedly being denied services due to your disability and service animal," said Deepa Goraya, a Washington Lawyers' Committee staff attorney. "There is no excuse for this discrimination. By taking legal action, we hope to prevent this type of discrimination in the future and ensure that Uber and its drivers accommodate service animals that are often vital to a blind passenger's mobility."
"Federal law requires Uber to treat blind customers equally and accommodate their service animals," said Peter Romer-Friedman, Deputy Director of Litigation of the Washington Lawyers' Committee. "Uber cannot build its business model around flouting laws that protect consumers or workers."
When Congress enacted the ADA, it provided a clear and national mandate for the elimination of discrimination against individuals with disabilities. Such prohibited discrimination includes discrimination in the provision of taxi services and other public and private transportation. Services like Uber must reasonably accommodate blind passengers and their service dogs.
Washington Lawyers' Committee
Established in 1968, the nonprofit Washington Lawyers' Committee provides pro bono legal services to address discrimination and poverty issues in the Washington, DC region. The Washington Lawyers' Committee's work has included thousands of civil rights cases on behalf of individuals and groups in the areas of equal employment opportunity, fair housing, public accommodations, immigrant rights, disability rights, public education, veterans' rights, lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender rights, and prisoners' rights.
DC, Gilbert LLP
Based in Washington, DC, Gilbert LLP is a law firm focused on insurance recovery and litigation, and strategic consulting. The firm's clients include business entities, debtors and creditors in bankruptcy matters, trusts and committees formed in such cases, law firms, accounting firms and other professional service organizations, non-profits and individuals.
Attribution/Source(s):
This quality-reviewed publication was selected for publishing by the editors of Disabled World due to its significant relevance to the disability community. Originally authored by Washington Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs, and published on 2016/06/03 (Edit Update: 2024/04/17), the content may have been edited for style, clarity, or brevity. For further details or clarifications, Washington Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs can be contacted at washlaw.org. NOTE: Disabled World does not provide any warranties or endorsements related to this article.
Page Information, Citing and Disclaimer
Disabled World is a comprehensive online resource that provides information and news related to disabilities, assistive technologies, and accessibility issues. Founded in 2004 our website covers a wide range of topics, including disability rights, healthcare, education, employment, and independent living, with the goal of supporting the disability community and their families.
Cite This Page (APA): Washington Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs. (2016, June 3 - Last revised: 2024, April 17). Blind Passenger Sues Uber for Dragging Her and Service Dog Down the Street. Disabled World. Retrieved September 8, 2024 from www.disabled-world.com/disability/legal/uber-sued.php
Permalink: <a href="https://www.disabled-world.com/disability/legal/uber-sued.php">Blind Passenger Sues Uber for Dragging Her and Service Dog Down the Street</a>: Federal law requires Uber to treat blind customers equally and accommodate their service animals.
Disabled World provides general information only. Materials presented are never meant to substitute for qualified medical care. Any 3rd party offering or advertising does not constitute an endorsement.