When Climate Change Affects Health, Do People Pay More Attention?
Author: George Mason University
Published: 2010/07/19 - Updated: 2024/11/06
Publication Type: Informative
Peer-Reviewed: Yes
Topic: Food Security Information - Publications List
Page Content: Synopsis Introduction Main
Synopsis: Study suggests that re-framing the climate emergency issue helps people better understand and relate to the climate change problems.
Why it matters: This article provides a comprehensive overview of the complex relationship between climate change and food security, making it a valuable resource for understanding this critical global issue. It explores how rising temperatures, changing precipitation patterns, and extreme weather events directly impact agricultural productivity, food availability, and nutritional quality. The article also delves into the cascading effects of climate change on various aspects of food systems, including production, distribution, and access. By highlighting the interconnectedness of climate change, agriculture, and human health, the page offers insights into the challenges faced by vulnerable populations and emphasizes the need for adaptive strategies and sustainable practices to ensure food security in a changing climate - Disabled World (DW).
Introduction
Framing climate change as a public health problem seems to make the issue more relevant, significant and understandable to members of the public even some who don't generally believe climate change is happening, according to preliminary research by George Mason University's Center for Climate Change Communication (4C). The center recently conducted an exploratory study in the United States of people's reactions to a public health-framed short essay on climate change. They found that on the whole, people who read the essay reacted positively to the information. Previous research conducted by Mason investigators and others, using people's beliefs, behaviors and policy preferences about global warming as assessed in a national survey, identified six distinct segments of Americans, termed Global Warming's Six Americas.
Main Item
In the current research, 4C director Edward Maibach interviewed approximately one dozen people in each of the Six Americas after they read the brief essay on the human health implications of global warming. As expected, he found that members of the audience segments who already believe strongly that climate change is happening had a strong positive response to the new information, while people who are less sure if climate change is happening also found value in the information.
Nearly half of the comments made by members of the "Disengaged" segment, for example, indicated that the essay reflected their personal point of view, was informative or thought-provoking or offered valuable prescriptive information on how to take action relative to climate change. Moreover, about 40 percent of those people in the "Doubtful" segment had similar positive reactions to the essay.
"Re-defining climate change in public health terms should help people make connection to already familiar problems such as asthma, allergies and infectious diseases, while shifting the visualization of the issue away from remote Arctic regions and distant peoples and animals," says Maibach. "The public health perspective offers a vision of a better, healthier future not just a vision of an environmental disaster averted."
The research, which was published in the latest issue of the BioMed Central Public Health journal, also provides clues about specific public health messages that might not be helpful (such as eating less meat) and points to examples or associations that might trigger counter-arguments and negative reactions.
"Many leading experts have suggested that a positive vision for the future, rather than a dire one, is precisely what has been missing from the public dialog on climate change thus far," says Maibach. "We believe this survey is one step in shaping a way to talk about climate change that will reach all segments of the public not just those who already are making behavioral changes."
Related Information
- Summer of 2022 Caused Over 61,000 Deaths in Europe
- Health Impact from Climate Change
- Climate Health and People with Disabilities (PWD)
Attribution/Source(s):
This peer reviewed publication was selected for publishing by the editors of Disabled World (DW) due to its significant relevance to the disability community. Originally authored by George Mason University, and published on 2010/07/19 (Edit Update: 2024/11/06), the content may have been edited for style, clarity, or brevity. For further details or clarifications, George Mason University can be contacted at gmu.edu. NOTE: Disabled World does not provide any warranties or endorsements related to this article.