Diet Changes May Block Aggressive Breast Cancer Spread
Author: Thomas Jefferson University
Published: 2014/05/30 - Updated: 2025/06/20
Publication Details: Peer-Reviewed, Research, Study, Analysis
Category Topic: Treatment of Cancer - Publications List
Page Content: Synopsis - Introduction - Main - Insights, Updates
Synopsis: This research from Thomas Jefferson University demonstrates how calorie restriction may significantly reduce metastasis risk in triple negative breast cancer, one of the most aggressive cancer forms. The study, published in the peer-reviewed journal Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, shows that reducing caloric intake by 30 percent triggers epigenetic changes that strengthen the extracellular matrix surrounding tumors, essentially creating a protective cage that prevents cancer cells from escaping and spreading to other body sites. This occurs through decreased production of microRNAs 17 and 20, which are typically elevated in metastatic triple negative cancers. The research is particularly valuable for cancer patients, including those with disabilities and seniors, as it offers a potentially accessible intervention that could improve treatment outcomes when conventional therapies like chemotherapy and radiation often lead to weight gain and reduced treatment effectiveness - Disabled World (DW).
Introduction
Calorie restriction is defined as a kind of dieting in which food intake is decreased by a certain percentage, Calorie restriction has been touted as a way to help people live longer. New research suggests that there may be other benefits, including improving outcomes for women in breast cancer. According to a study published May 26th in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, the triple negative subtype of breast cancer - one of the most aggressive forms - is less likely to spread, or metastasize, to new sites in the body when mice were fed a restricted diet.
Main Content
"The diet turned on a epigenetic program that protected mice from metastatic disease," says senior author Nicole Simone, M.D., an associate professor in the department of Radiation Oncology at Thomas Jefferson University.
Indeed, when mouse models of triple negative cancer were fed 30 percent less than what they ate when given free access to food, the cancer cells decreased their production of microRNAs 17 and 20 (miR 17/20). Researchers have found that this group of miRs is often increased in triple negative cancers that metastasize.
Breast cancer patients are often treated with hormonal therapy to block tumor growth, and steroids to counteract the side effects of chemotherapy. However, both treatments can cause a patient to have altered metabolism which can lead to weight gain. In fact, women gain an average of 10 pounds in their first year of treatment. Recent studies have shown that too much weight makes standard treatments for breast cancer less effective, and those who gain weight during treatment have worse cancer outcomes.
"That's why it's important to look at metabolism when treating women with cancer," says Dr. Simone.
In earlier studies, Dr. Simone and colleagues had shown that calorie restriction boosted the tumor-killing effects of radiation therapy. This study aimed to examine which molecular pathways were involved in this cooperative effect.
The investigators noticed that microRNAs - a type of RNA that regulates other genes in the cell - specifically miR 17 and 20, decreased the most when mice were treated with both radiation and calorie restriction. This decrease in turn increased the production of proteins involved in maintaining the extracellular matrix.
"Calorie restriction promotes epigenetic changes in the breast tissue that keep the extracellular matrix strong," says Dr. Simone. "A strong matrix creates a sort of cage around the tumor, making it more difficult for cancer cells to escape and spread to new sites in the body."
Understanding the link to miR 17 also gives researchers a molecular target for diagnosing cancers that are more likely to metastasize and, potentially, for developing a new drug to treat the cancers. In theory, a drug that decreased miR 17 could have the same effect on the extracellular matrix as calorie restriction. However, targeting a single molecular pathway, such as the miR17 is unlikely to be as effective as calorie restriction, says Dr. Simone. Triple negative breast cancers tend to be quite different genetically from patient to patient. If calorie restriction is as effective in women as it is in animal models, then it would likely change the expression patterns of a large set of genes, hitting multiple targets at once without toxicity.
In order to test that this hypothesis is true in humans, Dr. Simone is currently enrolling patients in the CaReFOR (Calorie Restriction for Oncology Research) trial. As the first trial like it in the country, women undergoing radiation therapy for breast cancer receive nutritional counseling and are guided through their weight loss plan as they undergo their treatment for breast cancer.
Additional
The study was funded by the NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30-CA56036 for the Kimmel Cancer Center.
L. Jin, et al., "The metastatic potential of triple-negative breast cancer is decreased via caloric restriction-mediated reduction of the miR-17~92 cluster," Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2014.
Insights, Analysis, and Developments
Editorial Note: While this mouse model research offers promising insights into the relationship between metabolism and cancer progression, the transition to human application requires careful consideration of individual patient circumstances, particularly for vulnerable populations who may face additional challenges with dietary modifications. The ongoing CaReFOR clinical trial will provide crucial data on whether these laboratory findings translate to meaningful clinical benefits, potentially offering a low-cost, accessible adjunct therapy that could complement existing cancer treatments without the toxicity profile of pharmaceutical interventions - Disabled World (DW).Attribution/Source(s): This peer reviewed publication was selected for publishing by the editors of Disabled World (DW) due to its relevance to the disability community. Originally authored by Thomas Jefferson University and published on 2014/05/30, this content may have been edited for style, clarity, or brevity. NOTE: Disabled World does not provide any warranties or endorsements related to this article.