Health Equity and Disparities Include People with Disabilities
Author: Oregon State University
Published: 2015/03/01 - Updated: 2024/06/17
Publication Type: Announcement
Peer-Reviewed: Yes
Topic: Health and Disability - Publications List
Page Content: Synopsis - Introduction - Main
Synopsis: Reducing the incidence of preventable diseases in this population could lead to improved quality of life. People with disabilities have unmet medical needs and poorer overall health and should be recognized as a health disparity group so more attention can be directed to improving their quality of life
Introduction
Defining Health Equity
Health equity refers to the study of differences in the quality of health and healthcare across different populations. Health equity is different from health equality, as it refers only to the absence of disparities in controllable or remediable aspects of health. It is not possible to work towards complete equality in health, as there are some factors of health that are beyond human influence. Inequity implies some kind of social injustice. Thus, if one population dies younger than another because of genetic differences, a non-remediable/controllable factor, we tend to say that there is a health inequality. On the other hand, if a population has a lower life expectancy due to lack of access to medications, the situation would be classified as a health inequity.
Main Item
Health Disparity
Health disparities are also related to inequities in education. Dropping out of school is associated with multiple social and health problems. Overall, individuals with less education are more likely to experience a number of health risks, such as obesity, substance abuse, and intentional and unintentional injury, compared with individuals with more education.
Disabled - A Health Disparity Group?
People with disabilities have unmet medical needs and poorer overall health throughout their lives, and as a result should be recognized as a health disparity group so more attention can be directed to improving their quality of life, a team of policy researchers has found.
"Many of the health concerns of people with disabilities, including diabetes, heart disease and obesity, are largely preventive and unrelated to the disability," said Gloria Krahn of Oregon State University's College of Public Health and Human Sciences. Krahn is lead author on a new paper advocating the recognition.
"There's no overt reason, based on the diagnosed condition, that people with disabilities should have higher rates of these diseases," said Krahn, the Barbara E. Knudson Endowed Chair in Family Policy and a professor of practice in public health at OSU. "There may always be some disparity in health because of a person's disability, but people can have disabilities and also be healthy."
The researchers' findings were published this month in an article in the American Journal of Public Health. Co-authors are Deborah Klein Walker of Abt Associates and Rosaly Correa-de-Araujo of the National Institutes of Health. The article was based on research conducted primarily while Krahn was working at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
People with significant disabilities - defined federally as functional limitations of movement, vision, hearing or problem-solving - make up about 12 percent of the U.S. population. Reducing the incidence of preventable diseases in this population could lead to improved quality of life as well as significant reductions in health care costs, Krahn said.
Race and ethnicity are used to define health disparity populations by state and federal governments. Disability is not recognized as a disparity population, even though people with disabilities are, on average, in poorer health than the rest of the population. Adults with disabilities are 2.5 times more likely to report skipping or delaying health care because of costs and they have higher rates of chronic disease than the general population, for example.
Establishing disability as a health disparity group is a way of bringing attention to a group that clearly has unmet needs, Krahn said.
The researchers suggest that recognizing people with disabilities as a health disparity population could lead to:
- Improved access to health care and human services for the disabled.
- Increased data on the disabled population, aiding in policy-making.
- Added training for health care providers, strengthening the workforce and improving care for the disabled.
- Improved public health programs that are designed to be inclusive of people with disabilities.
- Enhanced emergency-preparedness; people with disabilities can be especially vulnerable in emergency or disaster situations.
A focus on the health disparity could lead to creation of health promotion materials that are accessible to people with disabilities; development of weight-loss or smoking cessation programs to serve the disabled; and emergency evacuation and shelter training for people with disabilities, Krahn suggested.
"To say that disability is a health disparity will mark a significant shift in approach toward health care of people with disabilities," Krahn said. "It would influence public health practice, research and policy."
Related Information
- Disabled People a Health Disparity Population: The NIMHD decision to name disabled people as a health disparity population is a monumental step in the right direction.
- HIV Disparities for Those with Disabilities: Study of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities examines gaps in HIV care and disparities in care for Black patients and patients with autism and co-occurring intellectual disabilities.
- Health Care Algorithms in Racial and Ethnic Disparities: Study points to ways to reduce potential for racial bias and inequity when using algorithms to inform clinical care.
- HHS Plan to Reduce Health Disparities: National Partnership for Action launches strategy to strengthen and expand community-led efforts to achieve health equity.
Attribution/Source(s): This peer reviewed publication was selected for publishing by the editors of Disabled World (DW) due to its relevance to the disability community. Originally authored by Oregon State University and published on 2015/03/01, this content may have been edited for style, clarity, or brevity. For further details or clarifications, Oregon State University can be contacted at oregonstate.edu NOTE: Disabled World does not provide any warranties or endorsements related to this article.