Does Chronic Lyme Disease Actually Exist?
Author: Elsevier Health Sciences(i)
Published: 2010-09-02 : (Rev. 2019-07-01)
Synopsis and Key Points:
Lyme disease is frequently diagnosed and treated by primary care physicians.
Nearly one-half did not believe that chronic Lyme disease is a legitimate diagnosis.
The existence of chronic Lyme disease is an issue of sharp debate within the medical community.
Chronic Lyme disease: How often is it diagnosed and treated?
The existence of chronic Lyme disease is an issue of sharp debate within the medical community. Some health care workers who call themselves "Lyme literate" insist that chronic Lyme disease is frequently diagnosed and treated by primary care physicians. Others, however, including the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Infectious Diseases Society of America, state that there is no convincing biological evidence that chronic Lyme disease exists.
Many doctors are concerned with the potential dangers associated with the prolonged and intensive use of oral and intravenous antibiotics (the recommended treatment for chronic Lyme disease), such as blood clots and life threatening infections. A study soon to be published in The Journal of Pediatrics attempts to determine how often chronic Lyme disease is actually being diagnosed and treated.
Named for a community in Connecticut where it was first diagnosed, Lyme disease is a multi-system infection caused by the bacteria B. burgdoferi. Treatment typically includes a 10-28 day course of oral antibiotics. "Lyme literate" groups, such as the International Lyme and Associated Diseases Society (ILADS), define chronic Lyme disease as a debilitating illness caused by a persistent infection of B. burgdoferi; symptoms include fatigue, difficulty concentrating, headaches, and irritability. Treatment requires oral and/or intravenous antibiotic therapy that can last from several months to several years.
Dr. Michael Johnson, now at the Hospital of Saint Raphael in New Haven, and Dr. Henry Feder, of the University of Connecticut Health Center, attempted to determine how frequently Connecticut doctors were diagnosing and treating chronic Lyme disease. Of the 285 primary care physicians who responded to the survey:
- Nearly one-half did not believe that chronic Lyme disease is a legitimate diagnosis.
- 48% were undecided.
- Only 6 physicians or 2.1% diagnosed and treated patients for chronic Lyme disease. These 6 physicians treated patients for an average of 20 weeks with oral antibiotics; however, because these six physicians did not treat their patients with months to years of oral and/or intravenous antibiotics, they do not fit into the "Lyme literate" category.
Contrary to the assertions of the "Lyme literate" community, Dr. Feder does not believe intravenous antibiotic treatment is common practice.
"The 6 physicians in our study who treated patients with chronic Lyme disease do not fit into the 'Lyme literate' group," he explains, "because they treated their patients for an average of 20 weeks not months to years and it does not appear that intravenous therapy was used."
According to Dr. Feder, "Physicians who diagnose patients with chronic Lyme disease, and put these patients in harm's way with months to years of potentially dangerous antibiotics, are outliers."
These findings call into question the claims of "Lyme literate" advocacy groups, like ILADS, that chronic Lyme disease is frequently diagnosed and treated by many primary care physicians.
Although the number of physicians diagnosing and treating patients with chronic Lyme disease may be small, their influence seems to be growing. "The 'Lyme literate' network has been pivotal in advocating legislation in multiple states requiring insurance companies to cover the costs of intravenous therapy for presumed chronic Lyme disease," Dr. Feder notes.
The debate over chronic Lyme disease is likely to continue as insurance companies and legislative bodies become more involved.
The study, reported in "Chronic Lyme Disease: A Survey of Connecticut Primary Care Physicians" by Michael Johnson, MD and Henry Feder, Jr. MD, appears in The Journal of Pediatrics, DOI 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.06.031, published by Elsevier.
(i)Source/Reference: Elsevier Health Sciences. Disabled World makes no warranties or representations in connection therewith. Content may have been edited for style, clarity or length.
- 1 - The Recommended Way to Remove a Tick : Disabled World (2009/02/16)
- 2 - Does Chronic Lyme Disease Actually Exist? : Elsevier Health Sciences (2010/09/02)
- 3 - Lyme Disease is Not the Only Tick-Borne Disease to Watch Out For : The National Science Foundation (NSF) (2012/09/07)
- 4 - Borrelia Miyamotoi - New Tick Transmitted Disease in North America : Hunterdon Medical Center (2013/02/20)
- 5 - Risk of Lyme Disease Anytime in Northwest California : DDC (2014/08/24)
- 6 - Water on the Knee Can Be Sign of Lyme Disease : American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (2015/11/01)
- 7 - Lyme Disease Ticks Reported in Nearly 50% of US Counties : Entomological Society of America (2016/01/19)
• Disabled World is strictly a news and information website provided for general informational purpose only and does not constitute medical advice. Materials presented are in no way meant to be a substitute for professional medical care by a qualified practitioner, nor should they be construed as such. Any 3rd party offering or advertising on disabled-world.com does not constitute endorsement by Disabled World.
• Please report outdated or inaccurate information to us.