Adderall Fails to Boost Cognition in Healthy Students
Author: University of Rhode Island
Published: 2018/07/28 - Updated: 2025/12/28
Publication Details: Peer-Reviewed, Research, Study, Analysis
Category Topic: Pharmaceuticals - Related Publications
Page Content: Synopsis - Introduction - Main - Insights, Updates
Synopsis: This research is a peer-reviewed pilot study conducted by researchers at the University of Rhode Island and Brown University examining stimulant use in college students without ADHD. The study found that while a standard 30 mg dose of Adderall improved focus and attention, it failed to enhance reading comprehension or fluency and actually impaired working memory - contrary to what many students believe about these drugs. The findings are particularly relevant to students, educators, and healthcare providers because they counter widespread assumptions about cognitive enhancement from prescription stimulants and reveal that individuals without ADHD deficits may experience negative cognitive effects from the medication, even though they report feeling better emotionally and experience increased heart rate and blood pressure. The researchers theorize that stimulants only benefit cognition when the brain has a functioning deficit to correct; in neurotypical brains already operating normally in executive function regions, the medication offers no advantage and may hinder performance - Disabled World (DW).
Introduction
Contrary to popular belief across college campuses, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medications may fail to improve cognition in healthy students and actually can impair functioning, according to a study by researchers at the University of Rhode Island and Brown University.
Main Content
Study co-investigators Lisa Weyandt, professor of psychology and a faculty member with URI's George and Anne Ryan Institute for Neuroscience, and Tara White, assistant professor of research in behavioral and social sciences at Brown University, had anticipated different findings.
"We hypothesized that Adderall would enhance cognition in the healthy students, but instead, the medication did not improve reading comprehension or fluency, and it impaired working memory," she said. "Not only are they not benefitting from it academically, but it could be negatively affecting their performance."
This first-ever multisite pilot study of the impact of so-called "study drugs" on college students who do not have ADHD comes at a time when use of prescription stimulants such as Adderall, Ritalin and Vyvanse is common among young adults who believe the drugs will improve their academic performance.
Research by Weyandt and others has estimated that 5 to 35 percent of college students in the United States and European countries without ADHD illegally use these controlled substances, buying or receiving them from peers, friends, or family.
Results of the new study, published last month in the journal Pharmacy, show that the standard 30 mg dose of Adderall did improve attention and focus - a typical result from a stimulant - but that effect failed to translate to better performance on a battery of neurocognitive tasks that measured short-term memory, reading comprehension and fluency.
Weyandt has a theory about why working memory would be adversely affected by the medication.
Brain scan research shows that a person with ADHD often has less neural activity in the regions of the brain that control executive function - working memory, attention, self-control. For people with ADHD, Adderall and similar medications increase activity in those regions and appear to normalize functioning.
"If your brain is functioning normally in those regions, the medication is unlikely to have a positive effect on cognition and my actually impair cognition. In other words, you need to have a deficit to benefit from the medicine," Weyandt said.
Participants in the study also reported their perceived effects of the drug and its impact on their emotions, with students reporting significant elevation of their mood when taking Adderall.
In contrast to the small, mixed effects on cognition, the drug had much larger effects on mood and bodily responses, increasing positive mood, emotional ratings of the drug effect, heart rate and blood pressure.
"These are classic effects of psychostimulants," said White. "The fact that we see these effects on positive emotion and cardiovascular activity, in the same individuals for whom cognitive effects were small or negative in direction, is important. It indicates that the cognitive and the emotional impact of these drugs are separate. How you feel under the drug does not necessarily mean that there is an improvement in cognition; there can be a decrease, as seen here in young adults without ADHD."
The physical effects from the drugs, such as increased heart rate and blood pressure, were expected, and underscored the difference with cognition.
"They are subjecting themselves to physiological effects but do not appear to be enhancing their neurocognition," Weyandt said.
She stressed, however, that the findings are based on a pilot study and need to be replicated with a substantially larger sample of college students.
The researchers recruited students from both universities, eliminating individuals who had taken ADHD medications or other drugs. After rigorous health screenings, 13 students participated in two five-hour sessions at White's lab at Brown and at Memorial Hospital in Pawtucket.
In the double-blind study, in which neither researchers nor participants know who is receiving the placebo and who is receiving the study medication, each student received Adderall in one session and the placebo in the other. This allowed the researchers to see the effects of the medication vs. placebo in individuals and across the group.
Given the important and unexpected results from the study, Weyandt and White plan to apply for federal funding to continue the research with a larger group of healthy college students.
About the Research
This research was supported by grants from the Rhode Island Neuroscience Collaborative, the Brown (now Carney) Institute for Brain Science, the George and Anne Ryan Institute for Neuroscience and the Norman Prince Neurosciences Institute at Rhode Island Hospital as well as divisions within the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation.
Nootropics: Smart Drug Intelligence Enhancer Supplements - Information on smart drugs, also known as Nootropics or intelligence enhancers, used to improve brain mental function.
Insights, Analysis, and Developments
Editorial Note: This pilot study raises an important public health question about prescription stimulant misuse among college students, where research estimates that 5 to 35 percent use these drugs without a diagnosis. The disconnect between how students feel on the medication - experiencing elevated mood and increased alertness - and what it actually does for their cognitive performance suggests that subjective improvement can mask genuine cognitive decline. The researchers themselves acknowledge the study's small sample size and call for larger-scale replication before drawing firm conclusions, which is appropriate scientific caution; however, these preliminary findings are significant enough to warrant broader discussion on campuses and among prescribers about the real versus perceived benefits of ADHD medications for non-ADHD populations, particularly given the cardiovascular risks that accompany use without medical necessity - Disabled World (DW).Attribution/Source(s): This peer reviewed publication was selected for publishing by the editors of Disabled World (DW) due to its relevance to the disability community. Originally authored by University of Rhode Island and published on 2018/07/28, this content may have been edited for style, clarity, or brevity.