Gulf War Illness: Institute of Medicine Report

Topic: Disabled Veterans News
Author: Veterans for Common Sense
Published: 2016/02/13 - Updated: 2023/06/30
Publication Type: Reports and Proceedings - Peer-Reviewed: Yes
Contents: Summary - Introduction - Main Item - Related Topics

Synopsis: Report recommends stopping research on health effects of Gulf War exposures and focus instead on mind-body interconnectedness. The report also noted two studies showing an increased risk of brain cancer mortality associated with the wartime demolition of a vast Iraqi chemical weapons depot at Khamisiyah. Veterans who were more exposed to chemicals - particularly pesticides, PB (a nerve agent pretreatment pill), and perhaps nerve gas - are more likely to be ill, and to have more severe illness.

Introduction

Gulf War Illness is the "signature" health problem of 1991 Gulf War veterans, affecting an estimated 24-33% of the nearly 700,000 who served, according to a new report of the Institute of Medicine, but researchers say its recommendations, "turn science on its head."

Main Item

"The previous IOM report correctly concluded that the illness is not psychiatric and likely results from the interplay of genetic and environmental factors," said James Binns, former chairman of the federal Research Advisory Committee on Gulf War Veterans' Illnesses. "This report turns that science on its head."

"This report recommends stopping research on the health effects of Gulf War exposures and focusing instead on 'mind-body interconnectedness'," said Gulf War veteran Anthony Hardie, who chairs a treatment research program funded by Congress. "It's the same old government theme from the 1990's to deny what happened and deny care and benefits - just when research to understand the illness and identify treatments is finally making real progress."

The report noted two studies showing an increased risk of brain cancer mortality associated with the wartime demolition of a vast Iraqi chemical weapons depot at Khamisiyah - one conducted by the IOM itself - but then concluded this evidence was "insufficient/inadequate."

"This is a profoundly sad message for Gulf War veterans with brain cancer and their widows who can't currently get benefits from VA," said Hardie, who also serves as director of Veterans for Common Sense.

"IOM committees should not be made up of former VA officials and their friends," said Rick Weidman, Executive Director for Policy and Governmental Affairs for Vietnam Veterans of America. "It's outrageous that the VA Undersecretary from the 1990's who began the policy of minimizing Gulf War Illness was on this committee, or that the committee chair was on record before she was appointed saying you can't say what caused it. Half the committee was psychiatric advocates. It's exactly how the effects of Agent Orange were denied for thirty years after Vietnam. We intend to seek legislation to prohibit these corrupt practices."

"The science is unequivocal, if viewed honestly and in its totality: Toxic exposures were responsible," said Dr. Beatrice Golomb, Professor of Medicine at the University of California-San Diego and former scientific director of the Research Advisory Committee. "But the IOM doesn't look at all relevant studies. This 'don't look, don't find' practice has been a consistent problem in IOM Gulf War reports."

"Veterans who were more exposed to chemicals - particularly pesticides, PB (a nerve agent pretreatment pill), and perhaps nerve gas - are more likely to be ill, and to have more severe illness. Moreover, exposure to related chemicals in civilian settings has produced similar chronic health problems," said Dr. Golomb.

Resources That Provide Relevant Related Information

Attribution/Source(s):

This peer reviewed publication was selected for publishing by the editors of Disabled World due to its significant relevance to the disability community. Originally authored by Veterans for Common Sense, and published on 2016/02/13 (Edit Update: 2023/06/30), the content may have been edited for style, clarity, or brevity. For further details or clarifications, Veterans for Common Sense can be contacted at veteransforcommonsense.org. NOTE: Disabled World does not provide any warranties or endorsements related to this article.

Explore Related Topics

1 - - Introducing bipartisan legislation to end unfair offset of retirement pay and disability benefits for military retirees.

2 - - The Major Richard Star Act would repeal current unfair offset, allowing disabled veterans to receive both retirement pay and disability compensation.

3 - - U.S. Department of Defense to welcome home disabled veterans and certain caregivers with Army and Air Force Exchange Service in-store shopping privileges.

4 - - New email notification system for Air Force Disability Evaluation System will enhance customer service and increase transparency in Physical Evaluation Board process.

5 - - U.S. Veterans Affairs rule establishes a presumption of service connection for diseases associated with exposure to contaminants in the water supply at Camp Lejeune.

Complete List of Related Information

Page Information, Citing and Disclaimer

Disabled World is a comprehensive online resource that provides information and news related to disabilities, assistive technologies, and accessibility issues. Founded in 2004 our website covers a wide range of topics, including disability rights, healthcare, education, employment, and independent living, with the goal of supporting the disability community and their families.

Cite This Page (APA): Veterans for Common Sense. (2016, February 13 - Last revised: 2023, June 30). Gulf War Illness: Institute of Medicine Report. Disabled World. Retrieved October 6, 2024 from www.disabled-world.com/news/veterans/iom.php

Permalink: <a href="https://www.disabled-world.com/news/veterans/iom.php">Gulf War Illness: Institute of Medicine Report</a>: Report recommends stopping research on health effects of Gulf War exposures and focus instead on mind-body interconnectedness.

Disabled World provides general information only. Materials presented are never meant to substitute for qualified medical care. Any 3rd party offering or advertising does not constitute an endorsement.