$240M Awarded for Abuse of Workers with Disabilities
Author: U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Published: 2013/05/09 - Updated: 2025/06/09
Publication Type: Announcement
Category Topic: Disability Discrimination - Academic Publications
Page Content: Synopsis - Introduction - Main - Insights, Updates
Synopsis: This article details a landmark $240 million settlement awarded to workers with intellectual disabilities who faced severe abuse and exploitation at a turkey processing plant in Iowa. It outlines how the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) secured the largest verdict in its history against Hill Country Farms, operating as Henry's Turkey Service, for subjecting 32 men to inhumane conditions, including physical abuse, wage theft, and confinement in substandard housing over decades. The authoritative nature of the article stems from its reliance on verified legal outcomes and EEOC documentation, providing a clear, factual account of the case. This information is valuable for advocates, policymakers, and individuals with disabilities, as it highlights the critical need for workplace protections, raises awareness of systemic vulnerabilities, and underscores the role of federal intervention in addressing disability-based discrimination. It serves as a vital resource for those seeking to understand or combat workplace exploitation, particularly for vulnerable populations like individuals with intellectual disabilities and their caregivers - Disabled World (DW).
Introduction
Jury Awards $240 Million for Long-Term Abuse of Workers with Intellectual Disabilities - Historic Verdict Against Henry's Turkey Service for Men Subjected to Verbal and Physical Harassment, Housed in Substandard Facilities, Denied Medical Care.
Main Content
A Davenport, Iowa jury today awarded the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) damages totaling $240 million - the largest verdict in the federal agency's history - for disability discrimination and severe abuse.
The jury agreed with the EEOC that Hill County Farms, doing business as Henry's Turkey Service subjected a group of 32 men with intellectual disabilities to severe abuse and discrimination for a period between 2007 and 2009, after 20 years of similar mistreatment.
"The verdict sends an important message that the conduct that occurred here is intolerable in this nation, and hopefully will help to restore dignity and acknowledge the humanity of the workers who were mistreated for so many years," said EEOC Chair Jacqueline A. Berrien.
The company is based in Goldthwaite, Texas, but the work and abuse occurred in West Liberty and Atalissa, Iowa. The jury awarded each of the men $2 million in punitive damages and $5.5 million in compensatory damages. This verdict follows a September 2012 order from the district court judge that Henry's Turkey pay the men $1.3 million for unlawful disability-based wage discrimination, thus making the total judgment $241.3 million.
EEOC presented evidence to the jury that Henry's Turkey exploited these workers, whose jobs involved eviscerating turkeys, because their intellectual disabilities made them particularly vulnerable and unaware of the extent to which their legal rights were being denied. The affected men lived in Muscatine County, Iowa, where they worked for 20 years as part of a contract between Henry's Turkey and West Liberty Foods, an Iowa turkey processing plant.
"This historic verdict marks one of the EEOC's finest moments in its ongoing efforts to combat employment discrimination, especially discrimination against vulnerable and historically underserved populations," said EEOC General Counsel David Lopez. "The fact that the jury rendered the largest verdict ever obtained by the EEOC says volumes about the severity of the violation and it illustrates this agency's resolve to vindicate the rights of all discrimination victims."
Specifically, the EEOC presented evidence that for years and years the owners and staffers of Henry's Turkey subjected the workers to abusive verbal and physical harassment; restricted their freedom of movement; and imposed other harsh terms and conditions of employment such as requiring them to live in deplorable and sub-standard living conditions, and failing to provide adequate medical care when needed.
Verbal abuses included frequently referring to the workers as "retarded," "dumb ass" and "stupid." Class members reported acts of physical abuse including hitting, kicking, at least one case of handcuffing, and forcing the disabled workers to carry heavy weights as punishment. The Henry's Turkey supervisors, also the workers' purported caretakers, were often dismissive of complaints of injuries or pain.
"These men suffered isolation and exploitation for many years, while their employer cruelly consumed the fruits of their labor," said Robert A. Canino, regional attorney of the EEOC's Dallas District Office, which tried the case. "Our society has come a long way in learning how persons with intellectual disabilities should be fully integrated into the mainstream workplace, without having to compromise their human dignity."
Such abuse violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability, including intellectual disabilities, in terms and conditions of employment and wages and bars disability-based harassment. The EEOC filed its lawsuit (No. 3:11-cv-00041-CRW -TJS, in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa) after first attempting to settle the case through its conciliation process.
"The ADA provided us with a law enforcement tool to ensure fair treatment for persons with physical and mental disabilities," said Canino. He told the jury that Henry's Turkey treated the men "like property." He added, "The jury heard the human stories of these men, understood what they suffered, and valued their experiences in reaching their verdict." Canino said the men "feel humiliation and suffer distress from their experiences even to this day." Canino urged the jury to think of the "broken lives of 32 hard-working but vulnerable intellectually disabled men" who were employees of Henry's Turkey.
In support of its case and to detail the human story for each of the victims at trial, the EEOC relied upon a nationally recognized expert in the field of care and treatment of persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities, Dr. Sue Gant. Social workers from the Iowa Department of Human Services, former DHS manager Denise Gonzalez, and the staff of a disability support services provider, Exceptional Persons Inc. of Waterloo, Iowa, also provided in-depth personal perspectives with regard to the victims and the nature of the abuses suffered.
"Inherent in the ADA is the idea of dignity - that people with disabilities have the right to full and productive lives. This was the principle Henry's Turkey Service attempted to take away from these men and the principle the jury so emphatically restored," said Janet V. Elizondo, director of the EEOC's Dallas District Office. "The ADA starts from the idea that people with disabilities can be great employees, if given the opportunity to fairly compete and prove themselves."
In addition to the EEOC's disability-based harassment and discrimination verdict, the EEOC earlier won a $1.3 million wage discrimination judgment when Senior U.S. District Court Judge Charles R. Wolle found that, rather than the total of $65 dollars per month Henry's Turkey paid to the disabled workers while contracted to work on an evisceration line at the plant, the employees should have been compensated at the average wage of $11-12 per hour, reflecting pay typically earned by workers without intellectual disabilities who performed the same or similar work. The EEOC's wage claims for each worker ranged from $28,000 to $45,000 in lost income over the course of their last two years before the Henry's Turkey Service operation was shut down in February 2009.
Protecting vulnerable workers from disparate pay, harassment, and other discriminatory policies is one of the priorities identified in the EEOC's Strategic Enforcement Plan (SEP). The EEOC enforces the nation's laws prohibiting employment discrimination.
Insights, Analysis, and Developments
Editorial Note: The $240 million verdict stands as a powerful testament to the necessity of vigilant oversight and robust legal frameworks to protect workers with intellectual disabilities from exploitation. While the settlement cannot undo the decades of suffering endured by these men, it sends a resounding message to employers: abuse and discrimination will face severe consequences. This case also calls on society to reflect on the broader systemic gaps that allow such injustices to persist, urging stakeholders - government agencies, advocacy groups, and communities - to strengthen safeguards and promote inclusive workplaces. For individuals with disabilities and their families, this outcome reinforces the importance of knowing their rights and seeking justice, while reminding us all that dignity and fair treatment in the workplace are non-negotiable - Disabled World (DW).Attribution/Source(s): This quality-reviewed publication was selected for publishing by the editors of Disabled World (DW) due to its relevance to the disability community. Originally authored by U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and published on 2013/05/09, this content may have been edited for style, clarity, or brevity.