Supervalu Jewel-Osco Sued for Disability Rules and Discriminatory Leave

Author: EEOC
Published: 2009/09/15 - Updated: 2024/06/08
Publication Type: Announcement
Category Topic: Lawyers and Rights - Academic Publications

Page Content: Synopsis - Introduction - Main

Synopsis: Jewel-Osco is alleged to have refused to allow qualified employees with disabilities who are on authorized disability leave. In addition, the EEOC contends, Jewel-Osco failed to stop the harassment of an employee disabled by a seizure disorder at its Melrose Park, Ill., warehouse. Among other things said to him, the EEOC maintains, was Go have a seizure and crawl on the floor.

Introduction

Jewel-Osco, an operating unit of national grocery giant Supervalu, Inc., has been violating federal anti-discrimination law by its leave and disability policies, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charged in a lawsuit.

Main Content

According to the EEOC's suit, Jewel-Osco is alleged to have refused to allow qualified employees with disabilities who are on authorized disability leave, or who are eligible for it, to return to work if they have any work restrictions, and to have terminated them if they reach the one-year mark on leave. The EEOC also charges that the company has refused to allow qualified employees with disabilities to be assigned to temporary light duty jobs unless they were injured on the job.

In addition, the EEOC contends, Jewel-Osco failed to stop the harassment of an employee disabled by a seizure disorder at its Melrose Park, Ill., warehouse. Among other things said to him, the EEOC maintains, was 'Go have a seizure and crawl on the floor.'

The EEOC asserts that all this alleged conduct violates the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA).

The EEOC filed suit in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, EEOC v. SUPERVALU, INC. a Delaware corporation, and JEWEL-OSCO, an operating unit of SUPERVALU, INC., No. 09 CV 5637, assigned to District Judge Richard Guzman and Magistrate Judge Michael Mason, after first attempting to reach a voluntary settlement.

EEOC Chicago District Director John Rowe, who supervised the administrative investigation which the agency conducted before filing suit, said:

"The findings of our investigation were troubling. What we learned indicated to us that Jewel-Osco was apparently not moved to implement its leave policies in a way which might have brought capable disabled employees who had been on leave back to work-instead, they were shut out. We also learned about apparent on-the-job harassment of a disabled employee which was far out of bounds."

EEOC Chicago Regional Attorney John Hendrickson said:

"Whether discrimination on the basis of disability strikes at classes of employees or at a single individual, it violates the ADA. Whether the issue is one of leave or termination, accommodation or harassment, the lesson is the same - federal law requires that qualified individuals with disabilities be accorded a fair shot on the job. This case is going to be about seeing how this employer measured up against that standard."

The lawsuit is the second recently filed in Chicago by the EEOC against Jewel-Osco under the ADA. On September 4, 2009, the agency filed suit against the company, charging that it had failed to reasonably accommodate a pharmacy employee at its 183rd Street store in Homewood, Ill.; the employee suffered from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and severe allergic reactions to cosmetic fragrances.

The September 4 case (N.D. Ill. No. 09 CV 5504) has been assigned to District Judge Elaine E. Bucklo. Supervisory Trial Attorney Gregory Gochanour and Trial Attorney Gordon Waldron of the EEOC Chicago District Office will lead the agency's litigation team on todays case. The EEOC Chicago District Office is responsible for processing charges of discrimination, administrative enforcement, and the conduct of agency litigation in Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, and North and South Dakota, with Area Offices in Milwaukee and Minneapolis.

According to company information, Minneapolis-based Supervalu operates a store network with more than 2,500 locations under various brand names.


Attribution/Source(s): This quality-reviewed publication was selected for publishing by the editors of Disabled World (DW) due to its relevance to the disability community. Originally authored by EEOC and published on 2009/09/15, this content may have been edited for style, clarity, or brevity.

Explore Similar Topics

: New bill seeks to end age and disability discrimination in federal jury service, expanding civic inclusion for seniors and people with disabilities.

: Landmark settlement protects San Diego's unhoused living in vehicles, offering ticket forgiveness, safe parking, and disability accommodations.

Share Page

Citing and References

Founded in 2004, Disabled World (DW) is a leading resource on disabilities, assistive technologies, and accessibility, supporting the disability community. Learn more on our About Us page.

Cite This Page: EEOC. (2009, September 15 - Last revised: 2024, June 8). Supervalu Jewel-Osco Sued for Disability Rules and Discriminatory Leave. Disabled World (DW). Retrieved October 11, 2025 from www.disabled-world.com/disability/legal/eeoc-sues-supervalu-jewel-osco.php

Permalink: <a href="https://www.disabled-world.com/disability/legal/eeoc-sues-supervalu-jewel-osco.php">Supervalu Jewel-Osco Sued for Disability Rules and Discriminatory Leave</a>: Jewel-Osco is alleged to have refused to allow qualified employees with disabilities who are on authorized disability leave.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, it's important to note that our content is for general informational purposes only. We always recommend consulting qualified healthcare professionals for personalized medical advice. Any 3rd party offering or advertising does not constitute an endorsement.