Print Page

Psychological Testing for Disability Benefits Determination

Author: National Academy of Sciences
Published: 2015/04/10 - Updated: 2021/08/23
Topic: U.S. Social Security (Publications Database)

Page Content: Synopsis Introduction Main Item

Synopsis: Broader use of standardized psychological testing for applicants submitting disability claims should improve accuracy and consistency of disability determinations.

Testing should be required when the allegation is based primarily on the applicant's self-reporting of symptoms and is not accompanied by objective medical evidence or longitudinal medical records sufficient to make a disability determination.

The committee found that potential cost savings associated with testing vary considerably based on the assumptions about the groups to whom it is applied and how many false claims it detects, and thus rejects.

Introduction

Broader use of standardized psychological testing for applicants submitting disability claims to the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) should improve the accuracy and consistency of disability determinations, says a new report from the Institute of Medicine.

Main Item

Some proponents of mandatory psychological testing, in particular validity testing, for SSA disability applicants argue that it would result in a significant reduction of individuals allowed onto the benefits rolls and a substantial cost savings.

The committee that conducted the study and wrote the report said the data necessary to accurately assess the effects on the rolls or calculate financial costs and benefits are limited, and estimates based on available data are subject to considerable error. However, the report provides a framework for evaluating the financial impact of implementing the committee's recommendations.

In 2012, SSA provided benefits to nearly 15 million disabled adults and children. Under SSA, state agencies determine disability based on medical and other evidence considered relevant in an applicant's case record, which may include standardized psychological tests.

Cognitive psychological tests are performance-based and have people answer questions and solve problems as well as they possibly can.

Non-cognitive psychological tests are measures of typical behavior - such as personality, interests, values, and attitudes.

Validity tests can be used in conjunction with these standardized psychological tests to assess whether a test-taker is exerting sufficient effort to perform well, responding to the best of his or her capability, or providing an accurate report of his or her symptoms.

SSA recognizes that some psychological tests are valid and reliable and provide useful data, but it does not require psychological testing in cases involving mental disorders other than intellectual disability.

In addition, SSA policy precludes the purchase of validity tests as part of a consultative examination to supplement an applicant's case record. However, applicants and their representatives sometimes submit validity test results in support of their claims, and there are different opinions in the use and value of validity tests for work disability evaluations. In this context, the SSA asked IOM to carry out its study.

The committee recommended that under specified conditions, SSA should require standardized, non-cognitive psychological testing for all applicants whose allegation of non-cognitive functional impairment relates to a mental disorder unaccompanied by cognitive complaints or to a disorder with physical symptoms that are disproportionate to the medical findings.

Testing should be required when the allegation is based primarily on the applicant's self-reporting of symptoms and is not accompanied by objective medical evidence or longitudinal medical records sufficient to make a disability determination.

In addition, the SSA should require standardized cognitive testing be included in the case record for all applicants whose allegation of cognitive impairment is not accompanied by objective medical evidence

All non-cognitive and cognitive psychological testing should include a statement of evidence asserting the validity of the results.

Assessment of validity, including the use of validity tests, helps the evaluator interpret the accuracy of an individual's non-cognitive and cognitive test results. Therefore it is an important addition to the case record, the committee said. However, validity tests do not provide information about whether an individual is disabled, and a determination that the validity testing alone was not proved valid is insufficient grounds for denying a disability claim.

For cases in which validation is not achieved, SSA should pursue additional evidence of the applicant's allegation.

One of the main purported benefits of mandatory psychological testing, specifically validity testing, is the potential to generate substantial savings for the SSA disability programs.

The committee found that potential cost savings associated with testing vary considerably based on the assumptions about the groups to whom it is applied and how many false claims it detects, and thus rejects.

A full financial cost-benefit analysis of psychological testing will require SSA to collect additional data both before and after the implementation of the report's recommendations.

The study was sponsored by the U.S. Social Security Administration.

Established in 1970 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, the Institute of Medicine provides independent, objective, evidence-based advice to policymakers, health professionals, the private sector, and the public. The National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council make up the National Academies.

Attribution/Source(s):

This quality-reviewed publication was selected for publishing by the editors of Disabled World due to its significant relevance to the disability community. Originally authored by National Academy of Sciences, and published on 2015/04/10 (Edit Update: 2021/08/23), the content may have been edited for style, clarity, or brevity. For further details or clarifications, National Academy of Sciences can be contacted at nas.edu. NOTE: Disabled World does not provide any warranties or endorsements related to this article.

Explore Similar Topics

1 - - U.S. Social Security benefits and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) payments will increase 2.5 percent in 2025.

2 - - This article discusses the ABLE Act of 2014, which allows people with disabilities to save money in special ABLE accounts without losing their eligibility for essential government benefits.

3 - - Helpful SSI changes reducing customer burden take effect as agency expands access and continues removing barriers.

Complete Publications Database


Page Information, Citing and Disclaimer

Disabled World is a comprehensive online resource that provides information and news related to disabilities, assistive technologies, and accessibility issues. Founded in 2004 our website covers a wide range of topics, including disability rights, healthcare, education, employment, and independent living, with the goal of supporting the disability community and their families.

Cite This Page (APA): National Academy of Sciences. (2015, April 10 - Last revised: 2021, August 23). Psychological Testing for Disability Benefits Determination. Disabled World. Retrieved December 7, 2024 from www.disabled-world.com/disability/social-security/usa/testing.php

Permalink: <a href="https://www.disabled-world.com/disability/social-security/usa/testing.php">Psychological Testing for Disability Benefits Determination</a>: Broader use of standardized psychological testing for applicants submitting disability claims should improve accuracy and consistency of disability determinations.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, it's important to note that our content is for general informational purposes only. We always recommend consulting qualified healthcare professionals for personalized medical advice. Any 3rd party offering or advertising does not constitute an endorsement.