Does the U.S. Need to Ration Costly End-of-Life Care

Author: National Press Club
Published: 2010/03/16 - Updated: 2011/03/31
Topic: End-of-Life - Palliative Care - Publications List

Page Content: Synopsis - Introduction - Main

Synopsis: Should the government spend less on costly end-of-life procedures and instead use these resources to care for more patients.

Introduction

Controversial Issue to be Focus of Miller Center National Debate...

Main Item

With skyrocketing Medicare costs contributing to record-setting budget deficits, does the United States need to ration costly end-of-life care? This compelling topic will be the focus of an upcoming debate produced by the Miller Center of Public Affairs at the University of Virginia, in partnership with MacNeil/Lehrer Productions and The National Press Club.

The debate will take place at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C. on Wednesday, March 24 at 7:00 pm ET. It will be webcast live at www.millercenter.org and air later on PBS stations across the country.

Debaters include:

Ken Connor, Chairman, Center for a Just Society, Gov. Jeb Bush's Attorney in Terri Schiavo case

Marie Hilliard, Director of Bioethics and Public Policy, National Catholic Bioethics Center

Dr. Ira Byock, Director of Palliative Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Author, "Dying Well"

Arthur Caplan, Director, Center for Bioethics, University of Pennsylvania

Susan Dentzer, Editor-in-Chief of "Health Affairs" and a "PBS NewsHour" analyst, will moderate the debate.

With more than one-fourth of Medicare expenses going to medical treatment in patients' last year of life, debaters will argue what, if anything, the government should do to contain costs. Should the government spend less on costly end-of-life procedures and instead use these resources to care for more patients? Would it be better to ration by choice and let patients and their doctors decide on end-of-life care, such as living wills and pain management? What would be the social implications of a rationing policy? Would the government be deciding who is worth saving and who is not

This debate will be followed later this spring by debates on the cost of college moderated by Ray Suarez, senior correspondent for "PBS NewsHour" and on the impact of the Internet on democracy moderated by Robin MacNeil of MacNeil/Lehrer Productions.

The Miller Center of Public Affairs is a leading nonpartisan public policy institution aimed at bringing together engaged citizens, scholars, members of the media and government officials to focus on issues of national importance to the governance of the United States, with a special interest in the American presidency.

Explore Similar Topics

- Paper finds 26% of physician respondents reported ethical or religious barriers to participating in medical aid in dying, but many willing to engage in discussion with patients and provide referrals for care.

- A clinical study focusing on writing therapy demonstrates its potential to alleviate trauma, depression, anxiety, and feelings of hopelessness associated with cancer.

Citing and References

Founded in 2004, Disabled World (DW) is a leading resource on disabilities, assistive technologies, and accessibility, supporting the disability community. Learn more on our About Us page.

Cite This Page: National Press Club. (2010, March 16 - Last revised: 2011, March 31). Does the U.S. Need to Ration Costly End-of-Life Care. Disabled World (DW). Retrieved March 23, 2025 from www.disabled-world.com/medical/palliative/end-of-life-care-cost.php

Permalink: <a href="https://www.disabled-world.com/medical/palliative/end-of-life-care-cost.php">Does the U.S. Need to Ration Costly End-of-Life Care</a>: Should the government spend less on costly end-of-life procedures and instead use these resources to care for more patients.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, it's important to note that our content is for general informational purposes only. We always recommend consulting qualified healthcare professionals for personalized medical advice. Any 3rd party offering or advertising does not constitute an endorsement.