How People Judge the Exclusion of Others - Is it Their Own Fault?
Published : 2018-06-29
Author : University Of Basel - Contact: unibas.ch
Synopsis* : The way people view social exclusion of others varies depending on how much they think the excluded person is to blame, and is heavily influenced by how similar group members are to each other.
The way people view the social exclusion of others varies - depending on how much they think the excluded person is to blame. However, this is heavily influenced by how similar the group members are to each other, as a research team from the University of Basel writes in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
Most people have experienced ostracism, whether in school, at work, or among family or friends, as the person being excluded or as an observer. Even uninvolved observers often don't remain dispassionate when it comes to ostracism: when a group ostracizes someone out of unkindness or selfish motives, others usually view it very negatively as unfair.
However, outsiders may also judge ostracism to be justified, for example when the person being excluded has previously behaved very inappropriately or caused unrest within the group. Making this kind of moral judgment correctly is often difficult, as onlookers lack the necessary background information.
A research team from the University of Basel led by the psychologist Dr Selma Rudert has now conducted five studies to examine what evidence people are influenced by in such judgment situations.
The hypothesis was that similarity within the observed group is particularly important for the onlookers. The number of participants in each of the studies ranged from 30 to 527.
Pushed out Due to Differences
How outsiders see social exclusion depends on how similar the members of a group are to each other - Image Credit: University of Basel, Christiane Büttner.
We tend to find it more unjust when somebody is excluded who is visibly different from the others; we assume that this individual is only being excluded because they are different. If the excluded person is not visibly different to the group, however, onlookers usually assume that they have "brought it on themselves" through some kind of misconduct.
The researchers showed the participants various situations of ostracism, including a fictitious chatroom discussion in which three students discussed a presentation.
The somewhat stubborn ideas and suggestions from one of the students in the discussion were regularly ignored by the other two. When the ostracized person was "different" to the other two - for example, of a different skin color or from a different country - onlookers judged the exclusion to be unjust. They were annoyed at the two students and assessed them as bad collaborators.
However, when the group members were more similar - such as all from the same country - the onlookers' viewpoint changed: in this case, they assessed the excluded person negatively, placed the blame for the ostracism on him/her and wanted nothing to do with him/her.
Superficial Indicators Also Count
The research team also found that similarity influences social judgment even when it is only a superficial similarity, such as the excluded person having a different hairstyle. This suggests that people tend to unconsciously incorporate the similarity of the observed group into their moral judgment.
"These studies are important for topics such as bullying and ostracism in schools or workplaces," says Rudert. When people are too heavily influenced by superficial indicators and ignore actual information, it can quickly lead to misjudgments with serious consequences. If unfairly excluded people receive no support from others, their isolation will increase.
"Ideally," says Rudert, "you should always try to understand the whole history behind an ostracism situation before coming to a quick judgment."
How People Judge the Exclusion of Others - Is it Their Own Fault? | University Of Basel (unibas.ch). Disabled World makes no warranties or representations in connection therewith. Content may have been edited for style, clarity or length.
You're reading Disabled World. Be sure to check out our homepage for further informative disability news, reviews, disability sports events, exclusive stories and how-tos. You can also find us on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn.
Related Disability Discrimination Documents
- 1: Diversity in the TV Industry : How accurately minorities are represented in TV Industry jobs compared with presence in wider UK workforce and national population.
- 2: Stop Therapy Doll Shaming - A Personal Plea : A personal plea by Thecla, a survivor of childhood abuse and bullying, to stop therapy doll shaming and discrimination.
- 3: Silence is Golden: UK Human Rights Violations and the British Media : Paul Dodenhoff writes on the strange lack of coverage in the U.K. media in regards to recent human rights violations.
- 4: UK Disability Hate Crime Network : Information regarding The Disability Hate Crime Network in the U.K., a group that challenge hate crime committed against disabled people.
- 5: Analysing Characteristics of Disability Hate Crime : Paul Dodenhoff examines some key characteristics surrounding a number of high profile hate crime cases in the U.K..
*Disclaimer: Disabled World provides general information only. Materials presented are in no way meant to be a substitute for professional medical care by a qualified practitioner, nor should they be construed as such. Any 3rd party offering or advertising on disabled-world.com does not constitute endorsement by Disabled World. View our Advertising Policy for further information. Please report outdated or inaccurate information to us.
Journal: Disabled World. Language: English (U.S.). Author: University Of Basel. Electronic Publication Date: 2018-06-29. Title: How People Judge the Exclusion of Others - Is it Their Own Fault?, Source: <a href=https://www.disabled-world.com/disability/discrimination/judging-exclusion.php>How People Judge the Exclusion of Others - Is it Their Own Fault?</a>. Retrieved 2021-04-16, from https://www.disabled-world.com/disability/discrimination/judging-exclusion.php - Reference: DW#443-13485.