Why Babies Under Two Should Have No Screen Time At All

Author: University of Leeds
Published: 29 Jun 2026 - Updated: 12 Aug 2026
Publication Type: Reports & Proceedings

Table of Contents:
Synopsis - Definition - Overview - FAQs - Insights, Updates - Related Content

Synopsis

This research presents the most thorough systematic review to date of global peer-reviewed evidence on screen use among children under two, drawing together specialists in mental health, physical health and social science from four UK universities under the iADDICT team. Its authority rests on the breadth of peer-reviewed studies examined alongside the views of 174 parents gathered through surveys and focus groups, giving caregivers a clear, evidence-based picture of the risks. The findings are useful for parents, health professionals and early years practitioners, and the call for a baby screen time risk assessment could help families - including those caring for children with developmental vulnerabilities - to recognize warning signs and seek support sooner.*

At a Glance

• 1 - The review found that screens offer limited benefits for babies under two.
• 2 - Parent and caregiver screen time was found to correlate with babies' screen time.
• 3 - Researchers recommend outdoor time, non-digital toys, and screen-free mealtimes as evidenced alternatives.
• 4 - The team notes there is currently no UK government screen time guidance for adults, leaving caregivers without an example to follow.

Topic Definition

Infant Screen Time

Infant screen time refers to the exposure of children under the age of two to digital screens such as smartphones, tablets, televisions and games consoles, whether through deliberate, regular viewing or passive background presence. It covers the period that researchers describe as the first 1001 critical days, running from pregnancy through to a child's second birthday, when the developing brain is especially sensitive to its surroundings. The concept takes in both the direct effects of screens on a young child's bonding, play, language, sleep and physical health, and the wider household and cultural patterns - including the screen habits of caregivers themselves - that shape how early and how often babies come into contact with digital devices.

Overview

Avoid Intentional Screen Time for Under-twos

Using screens during the first 1001 days of life can lead to developmental concerns for the next generation, researchers warn.

Digital screen time for under-twos is associated with long-term impacts on health and quality of life, and limited benefits, according to the most comprehensive systematic review yet of global peer-reviewed research into babies' screen time.

Based on the findings, the iADDICT group of researchers from four UK universities recommends that under-twos should not receive any intentional, regular screen time. The academics are calling for any guidance that points under-twos to shared screen time, or suggests that screen technology is suitable for "all ages", to be reconsidered.

Researchers stress the findings reflect the pressures of modern digital environments rather than individual parenting choices. They hope the review will provide caregivers with the most up-to-date evidence so they can understand risks and seek support sooner.

Commissioned by the 1001 Critical Days Foundation, the research was conducted by academics across disciplines of mental health, physical health and social science from the University of Leeds, Leeds Trinity University, Aston University and Loughborough University. The study also invited 174 parents across the UK to share their views on young children's screen use and their concerns around it through an online survey and focus group interviews.

Report co-lead Rafe Clayton, Senior Lecturer in Media and Communication at the University of Leeds, said the under-twos issue is a global concern that in 2026 is not being adequately addressed, with implications for a whole generation and their future quality of life. He noted that screen time guidelines for children are not being followed, in part because the adults setting the example are themselves without guidance. With problematic screen use among adults common and no government screen time guidelines for adults in the UK, he argued that unguided adults are inadvertently teaching children and babies to develop unhealthy relationships with screen devices, and this has to change.

The research found a lack of guidance from health professionals for parents about screen use. The researchers believe this is a reminder of the discrepancies between government and healthcare guidance and the real challenges parents face on a daily basis, and call for more targeted support.

Assessing Risk for Babies

Existing guidance from the World Health Organization (2019) and the American Academy of Paediatrics (2024), which recommends that under-twos avoid screen time, is already being exceeded globally during the critical first 1001 days of life, from pregnancy to age two, according to the report.

The harms of this include reduced opportunities to bond with caregivers, reduced play with peers, limited language development, increased risk of overstimulation, difficulty sleeping, eye health implications, increased risk of childhood obesity and reliance on devices for emotional regulation. However, the review does not establish causal links between screen use and specific developmental conditions.

The researchers are calling for the creation of a baby screen time risk assessment in collaboration with policymakers, healthcare workers and early years practitioners. This could help services to provide targeted support, guide families toward interactive alternatives, and intervene where developmental vulnerabilities may be emerging.

Report co-lead Carmen Clayton, Professor of Family and Cultural Dynamics at Leeds Trinity University, said screen time is heavily interwoven into the lives of many families throughout the day. Caregivers are calling for more guidance, but professional support is limited. She said the Government must consider how to engage with families better about problematic screen use, while being sensitive to the fear of judgement that many parents face when opening up about such issues.

Tips for Parents

More research is needed into which strategies are most effective for parents and caregivers wanting to reduce and cut out babies' screen time. But the following strategies from the review have evidenced benefits:

• Taking children outdoors to spend time in nature prevents screen time and can benefit physical development and eye health.
• Avoiding using screens at mealtimes could correlate with healthier eating habits.
• Access to non-digital toys is beneficial for reducing screen time and improving development.
• Spending time in the physical presence of others - meeting, interacting and playing with other people - supports social development.

A Wake-up Call for Society

The review also found that parent and caregiver screen time correlates with babies' screen time, but the researchers emphasise that parents should not be the focus of blame or criticism here. Digital screens are embedded in our lives - from working, to buying groceries, accessing healthcare and communicating with friends and family - so passive screen exposure is inevitable.

To have healthy human futures, the researchers say we need to sustainably change our relationships with digital screens - including smartphones, tablets, TVs and games consoles - as a society. The first steps to societal change are focusing on understanding adult screen time thresholds, and reconsidering any guidance on screen time for children.

Dame Andrea Leadsom, Founder of 1001 Critical Days Foundation, called the review a wake-up call, saying the evidence increasingly suggests that screens offer limited benefits for babies and may carry significant risks during the first 1001 days, the most important period of human development. She said parents must not be blamed for a problem they did not create, and that many families are navigating this challenge without the information and support they need.

She added that every family should have access to a Best Start Family Hub, where they could access trusted advice and practical help during their baby's earliest years. Technology companies must play their part too, she said, and parents should not be presented with content labelled or promoted as suitable for babies when the evidence points to the contrary. She concluded that every baby should experience the best start in life, and that helping parents navigate the digital world is an essential part of making that ambition a reality.

Also See:

• Screen Time Linked to Child Psychological Problems: Children who spend longer than 2 hours in front of a computer or television screen more likely to suffer psychological difficulties.
• Link Between Child TV Time and Metabolic Syndrome: Study adds weight to the evidence that watching too much television as a child can lead to poor health in adulthood.
• When Children Are Allowed TV and Games in Bedroom: Education, health and behavior problems arise when children allowed televisions, mobile devices, and video game systems in their bedroom.
• Link Between Excessive Screen Time and Teen Suicide Risk: The more time teenagers spend on smartphones and other electronic screens, the more likely they are to feel depressed and think about, or attempt, suicide.
• 20-20-20 Screen Rule: Does it Help Prevent Eye Strain?: Researchers confirm that computer users taking a short break to look away from a device screen every 20 minutes improves symptoms of eye strain.

Frequently Asked Questions

NOTE: Researched FAQs by Disabled World (DW)

At what age is some screen time considered acceptable for children

Guidance from bodies such as the World Health Organization and the American Academy of Paediatrics generally advises avoiding screens for children under two, with small amounts of supervised, high quality content sometimes introduced for older toddlers and preschoolers.

Does background television count as screen time for a baby

Yes, passive background screen presence is included in infant screen time because it can still reduce interaction, distract from play, and interfere with a baby's sleep and attention even when the child is not actively watching.

What are some signs that a baby is getting too much screen exposure

Possible signs include difficulty settling to sleep, reduced interest in play or people, reliance on a device to calm down, and less babbling or eye contact during everyday interactions.

How can parents reduce their own screen use around their baby

Parents can set device free times such as meals and playtime, keep phones out of reach during bonding moments, and plan screen free activities like walks and reading to model healthier habits.

Is video calling with relatives the same as other screen time for babies

Many experts view interactive video calls with family as different from passive viewing because they involve real time social connection, though they are still best kept short and supported by an engaged caregiver.

What is a Best Start Family Hub

A Best Start Family Hub is a proposed community based service where families could access trusted advice and practical help during a child's earliest years, including guidance on navigating screens and early development.

Where can parents find reliable help if they are worried about screen habits

Parents can speak with their health visitor, pediatrician, or early years practitioner, and look to established public health guidance for balanced, evidence based advice without fear of judgment.

Insights, Analysis, and Developments

Editorial Note: What sets this review apart is its refusal to point the finger at parents, instead framing babies' screen exposure as a societal problem rooted in a digital world that few adults have been given the tools to navigate; by asking governments, healthcare systems and technology companies to share the responsibility, it reframes a familiar worry as a collective duty rather than a private failing.*

* Editorial additions by Ian C. Langtree.