LSAC to Pay $7.73M Over Discriminatory LSAT Policies

Author: U.S. Department of Justice
Published: 2014/05/21 - Updated: 2024/04/02
Publication Type: Announcement, Notification
Contents: Summary - Main - Related Publications

Synopsis: Agreement compels reforms to LSACs treatment of test takers with disabilities and brings end to LSACs practice of flagging score reports of people with disabilities who require certain testing accommodations. Without the necessary accommodations, test takers with disabilities are denied an equal opportunity to demonstrate their aptitude and achievement level. Under the proposed consent decree, LSAC will pay $7.73 million in penalties and damages to compensate over 6,000 individuals nationwide who applied for testing accommodations on the Law School Admission Test (LSAT) over the past five years.

Main Digest

The Justice Department filed a joint motion for entry of a landmark consent decree to resolve allegations that the Law School Admission Council (LSAC) engaged in widespread and systemic discrimination in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

Under the proposed consent decree, LSAC will pay $7.73 million in penalties and damages to compensate over 6,000 individuals nationwide who applied for testing accommodations on the Law School Admission Test (LSAT) over the past five years. The decree also requires comprehensive reforms to LSAC's policies and ends its practice of "flagging," or annotating, LSAT score reports for test takers with disabilities who receive extended time as an accommodation. These reforms will impact tens of thousands of test takers with disabilities for years to come.

The United States intervened in DFEH v. LSAC Inc., which was originally brought on behalf of California test takers in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The United States' intervention expanded the case to ensure comprehensive and nationwide relief under Title III of the ADA for individuals with disabilities who request testing accommodations for the LSAT - a required examination for anyone seeking admission to an American Bar Association approved law school in the United States.

The allegations in the complaint detail LSAC's routine denial of testing accommodation requests, even in cases where applicants have a permanent physical disability or submitted thorough supporting documentation from qualified professionals and demonstrated a history of testing accommodations since childhood. Without the necessary accommodations, test takers with disabilities are denied an equal opportunity to demonstrate their aptitude and achievement level. The lawsuit further alleged that LSAC engages in discrimination prohibited by the ADA through its practice of flagging the LSAT score reports of individuals who received extended time as a testing accommodation, thereby identifying to law schools that the test taker is a person with a disability.

"This landmark agreement compels systemic reforms to LSAC's treatment of test takers with disabilities and brings an end to LSAC's stigmatizing practice of flagging the score reports of individuals with disabilities who require certain testing accommodations," said Acting Assistant Attorney General Jocelyn Samuels for the Civil Rights Division.

"If entered by the court, this decree will impact tens of thousands of Americans with disabilities, opening doors to higher education that have been unjustly closed to them for far too long. We congratulate LSAC for signing this agreement, which will compensate victims of past discrimination and provide a model for the provision of testing accommodations to test takers with disabilities on standardized examinations."

"The participation of the U.S. Attorney's Office in this important litigation sends a strong message that no discrimination of any kind will be tolerated in this district," said U.S. Attorney Melinda Haag for the Northern District of California. "We are fully committed to ensuring equal access to all opportunities society has to offer, including education."

Under the consent decree, LSAC has agreed to:

Individuals who applied for testing accommodations from LSAC between Jan. 1, 2009, and the court's entry of the consent decree may be eligible to receive a monetary award from a nationwide victims' compensation fund. The claims administrator for the fund has not yet been determined; this information will be posted on LSAC's website following entry of the consent decree by the court. Questions about the victims' compensation fund should be directed to the claims administrator.

Attribution/Source(s):

This quality-reviewed publication pertaining to our Lawyers and Rights section was selected for circulation by the editors of Disabled World due to its likely interest to our disability community readers. Though the content may have been edited for style, clarity, or length, the article "LSAC to Pay $7.73M Over Discriminatory LSAT Policies" was originally written by U.S. Department of Justice, and submitted for publishing on 2014/05/21 (Edit Update: 2024/04/02). Should you require further information or clarification, U.S. Department of Justice can be contacted at the justice.gov website. Disabled World makes no warranties or representations in connection therewith.

📢 Discover Related Topics


👍 Share This Information To:
𝕏.com Facebook Reddit

Page Information, Citing and Disclaimer

Disabled World is an independent disability community founded in 2004 to provide disability news and information to people with disabilities, seniors, their family and/or carers. You can connect with us on social media such as X.com and our Facebook page.

Cite This Page (APA): U.S. Department of Justice. (2014, May 21). LSAC to Pay $7.73M Over Discriminatory LSAT Policies. Disabled World. Retrieved April 15, 2024 from www.disabled-world.com/disability/legal/agrees.php

Permalink: <a href="https://www.disabled-world.com/disability/legal/agrees.php">LSAC to Pay $7.73M Over Discriminatory LSAT Policies</a>: Agreement compels reforms to LSACs treatment of test takers with disabilities and brings end to LSACs practice of flagging score reports of people with disabilities who require certain testing accommodations.

Disabled World provides general information only. Materials presented are never meant to substitute for qualified professional medical care. Any 3rd party offering or advertising does not constitute an endorsement.