Interoception: The Foundation of Embodied Awareness

Understanding Interoception: Our Body's Inner Voice

Defining the Eighth Sense

While most people learn about five senses in elementary school, neuroscience has long recognized additional sensory systems that shape human experience. Beyond sight, sound, taste, touch, and smell lie proprioception - our sense of body position in space - and interoception, the perception of internal bodily states. First systematically described by neurologist Charles Sherrington in the early twentieth century, interoception encompasses the detection and interpretation of signals originating from within the body (Sherrington, 1906). These signals arise from receptors throughout the viscera, cardiovascular system, respiratory system, digestive tract, bladder, and skin, transmitting information about tissue states, metabolic needs, temperature regulation, and physiological balance.

The interoceptive system operates largely outside conscious awareness, yet its influence pervades nearly every aspect of human functioning. When we feel our heart racing before a presentation, sense the urgent need to use the restroom, recognize the gnawing sensation of hunger, or perceive the first signs of illness, we are experiencing interoception. More subtly, interoceptive signals contribute to emotional experiences, decision-making processes, and our fundamental sense of being alive and present in our bodies (Craig, 2002).

Contemporary neuroscience has revealed that interoception is not a single, unified sense but rather a complex system involving multiple neural pathways, processing centers, and levels of conscious awareness. Researchers now distinguish between interoceptive accuracy - the objective ability to detect internal signals - and interoceptive sensibility, which refers to one's subjective belief about their ability to perceive these signals (Garfinkel et al., 2015). The relationship between these dimensions is not always straightforward, and individuals may be highly accurate in detecting some internal states while remaining insensitive to others.

Main Content

Neural Architecture of Internal Sensing

The neurobiological substrate of interoception involves a sophisticated network of ascending pathways that carry information from the body's interior to higher brain centers. Specialized receptors called interoceptors are distributed throughout internal organs and tissues, responding to mechanical pressure, chemical changes, temperature fluctuations, and tissue damage. These receptors transmit signals primarily through the vagus nerve and spinal pathways to brainstem nuclei, where initial processing occurs (Critchley & Harrison, 2013).

From the brainstem, interoceptive information projects to subcortical structures including the thalamus and then to cortical regions, most notably the insular cortex. The insula, a folded region of cortex buried deep within the lateral sulcus, has emerged as a central hub for interoceptive processing. Neuroimaging studies consistently show insular activation during tasks requiring attention to internal bodily states, such as monitoring heartbeats or attending to breathing (Craig, 2009). The anterior insula, in particular, appears to integrate interoceptive signals with emotional and cognitive information, contributing to conscious feelings and self-awareness.

This ascending pathway does not simply transmit raw sensory data but actively constructs representations of bodily states through predictive processing. According to contemporary theories, the brain continuously generates predictions about expected interoceptive signals and compares these predictions with incoming sensory information (Seth & Friston, 2016). Discrepancies between predictions and actual signals - termed prediction errors - drive both learning and conscious awareness. This predictive framework helps explain why interoceptive experiences can be shaped by context, prior experience, and psychological factors.

The prefrontal cortex, particularly the ventromedial and dorsolateral regions, plays a crucial role in regulating attention to interoceptive signals and integrating this information with goals, memories, and social context. Connections between the insula, prefrontal cortex, and limbic structures create circuits that link bodily sensations with emotional responses, forming what some researchers call the "emotional body" (Damasio, 1999). These circuits explain why physical sensations often carry affective tone - why an elevated heart rate might feel exhilarating in one context and terrifying in another.

Continued below image.

Continued...

Everyday Manifestations of Interoceptive Processing

Interoception manifests in countless ways throughout daily life, though we often take these experiences for granted until they fail or become disordered. The sensation of hunger provides a clear example. When blood glucose levels drop and the stomach empties, mechanoreceptors and chemoreceptors send signals that ultimately generate the subjective feeling of hunger. Similarly, thirst arises from osmoreceptors detecting changes in blood osmolality and baroreceptors sensing blood volume changes. These homeostatic signals motivate behaviors that restore physiological balance.

Respiratory interoception - the sensation of breathing and air hunger - operates continuously, though usually below conscious awareness. Most people can shift attention to their breathing at will, feeling the expansion of the chest and abdomen, the movement of air through the nostrils, and the subtle work of respiratory muscles. During exercise or in situations where oxygen demand increases, the conscious experience of breathlessness intensifies, motivating rest or seeking fresh air. People with anxiety disorders often report heightened awareness of breathing, with this increased interoceptive focus sometimes triggering panic responses (Paulus & Stein, 2010).

Cardiac interoception - the ability to sense one's own heartbeat - has become a standard measure in interoception research. The heartbeat detection task, in which participants attempt to count their heartbeats without taking their pulse, reveals substantial individual differences. Some people can accurately track their cardiac rhythm, while others remain largely unaware of this constant internal signal. Research suggests that cardiac interoceptive accuracy correlates with emotional intensity and regulation capacity (Critchley et al., 2004).

Pain represents another crucial manifestation of interoception, though its status as purely interoceptive remains debated given its protective function and distinct neural pathways. Nevertheless, visceral pain - arising from internal organs - clearly falls within the interoceptive domain. The dull, diffuse ache of indigestion, the cramping of intestinal distress, the pressure of bladder fullness, and the deep fatigue of illness all exemplify interoceptive experiences that signal tissue states requiring attention or action.

Temperature regulation depends heavily on interoceptive processing. Thermoreceptors throughout the body detect temperature changes, generating sensations of warmth or cold that guide behavioral thermoregulation - seeking shelter, adjusting clothing, or changing activity levels. The sensation of fever, that characteristic feeling of being unwell that accompanies infection, arises partly from interoceptive processing of temperature changes and immune system activity.

Beyond these relatively discrete sensations, interoception contributes to more diffuse and complex experiences. The "gut feeling" that something is wrong, the tension that precedes tears, the lightness of joy, the heaviness of sadness - all these embodied aspects of emotion reflect interoceptive processing. The sense of fatigue that signals need for rest, the restlessness that precedes productive activity, and the overall feeling of vitality or malaise that characterizes each day all depend on the brain's interpretation of internal bodily signals.

Interoception Across the Lifespan: The Aging Experience

The ability to perceive and interpret internal bodily signals changes across the human lifespan, with particularly significant shifts occurring in later adulthood. While research on interoception in aging populations has expanded in recent years, the picture that emerges is complex and sometimes counterintuitive. Older adults face unique challenges related to interoceptive processing that can profoundly impact health, independence, and quality of life.

Several physiological changes associated with aging affect the interoceptive system directly. Receptor sensitivity may decline with age, reducing the strength of signals originating from internal organs. The vagus nerve, which carries much interoceptive information, shows age-related changes in structure and function. Neural processing centers, including the insular cortex, undergo volumetric changes and alterations in connectivity patterns. These neurobiological shifts occur against a backdrop of accumulated experience that shapes how older adults interpret bodily sensations (Khalsa et al., 2018).

Research on cardiac interoceptive accuracy in older adults has produced mixed findings. Some studies report modest declines in heartbeat detection accuracy with age, while others find no significant differences between younger and older adults. A key factor appears to be the type of interoceptive task and the physiological state during testing. Older adults may perform differently on tasks requiring sustained attention to subtle signals compared with tasks involving more obvious bodily changes.

One critical area where age-related interoceptive changes become clinically significant is thirst perception. Multiple studies have documented that older adults often report feeling less thirsty than younger adults under similar conditions of dehydration (Farrell et al., 2008). This blunted thirst response contributes to the increased risk of dehydration among seniors, a common and serious health concern. The mechanisms underlying reduced thirst sensation in aging remain incompletely understood but likely involve changes in osmoreceptor sensitivity, altered angiotensin responses, and modifications in how the brain interprets thirst-related signals.

Temperature regulation also shows age-related interoceptive changes. Older adults may have reduced awareness of being too cold or too hot, placing them at greater risk for hypothermia and heat-related illness. This diminished thermal interoception occurs alongside physiological changes in temperature regulation, creating a compounded vulnerability. During heat waves, seniors may not recognize their need to cool down until physiological stress becomes severe.

The relationship between interoception and balance deserves particular attention in aging populations. While proprioception - the sense of body position - is often distinguished from interoception, emerging evidence suggests these systems interact in complex ways. Vestibular signals, which contribute to balance and spatial orientation, integrate with interoceptive processing in the insular cortex. Age-related changes in how the brain integrates multiple sensory signals may contribute to fall risk, a major concern for older adults (Teasdale et al., 2013).

Appetite regulation represents another domain where interoceptive changes impact senior health. Many older adults experience reduced appetite and changes in how they experience hunger and satiety. This altered interoception of nutritional needs, combined with age-related changes in taste and smell, can contribute to unintentional weight loss and malnutrition. The mechanisms involve alterations in gut hormone signaling, changes in gastric distension sensitivity, and modifications in how the brain processes signals related to energy balance.

Pain perception shows complex changes with aging. While one might expect pain sensitivity to decrease with age, research reveals a more nuanced pattern. Older adults may show altered pain thresholds for some types of stimuli while maintaining sensitivity to others. Importantly, how older adults interpret and respond to pain can differ from younger populations, influenced by factors including pain history, expectations, and coping strategies developed over decades. Chronic pain conditions become increasingly common with age, and the relationship between ongoing pain and interoceptive processing deserves careful consideration.

An often-overlooked aspect of interoception in aging involves the detection of early illness symptoms. Older adults sometimes present with atypical symptoms during serious medical events. A heart attack might not produce the classic chest pain, or a serious infection might not trigger the expected fever response. Whether these atypical presentations reflect changes in how symptoms are generated or in how they are perceived and reported remains an area of active investigation. The clinical implications are substantial, as delayed recognition of serious illness can lead to worse outcomes.

Cognitive changes associated with aging may also influence interoceptive processing. The ability to direct and sustain attention to internal signals, to distinguish between different bodily sensations, and to remember and describe interoceptive experiences all depend on cognitive resources. When working memory, attention, or executive function decline, interoceptive processing may be affected indirectly. An older adult might struggle to identify whether discomfort is hunger, fatigue, or anxiety, not because the signals are unclear but because the cognitive work of interpretation has become more challenging.

Despite these challenges, aging also brings potential interoceptive advantages. Decades of experience with one's own body can enhance the ability to interpret signals in context. An older adult might recognize subtle signs of an approaching migraine, detect early symptoms of a urinary tract infection, or identify triggers for digestive discomfort more readily than a younger person lacking this experiential knowledge. This wisdom of embodiment represents a form of expertise that deserves recognition.

Social and environmental factors intersect with age-related interoceptive changes in meaningful ways. Older adults who live alone may have fewer external cues prompting attention to bodily needs - no one suggesting a glass of water on a hot day or noticing that they seem unwell. Conversely, excessive focus on bodily sensations, sometimes fostered by frequent medical appointments and discussions of symptoms, might lead to heightened interoceptive sensibility that doesn't correspond to objective accuracy.

Interoception and Disability: Diverse Experiences of Embodiment

The relationship between interoception and disability encompasses a vast terrain of human experience, from developmental conditions that shape how individuals process internal signals from birth to acquired disabilities that alter interoceptive pathways and processing. Understanding these relationships has profound implications for supporting health, autonomy, and quality of life for people with disabilities.

Autism spectrum disorder has emerged as a condition centrally involving altered interoceptive processing. Research over the past decade has revealed that many autistic individuals experience differences in how they perceive and interpret internal bodily signals. These differences contribute to challenges that extend far beyond the social and communication difficulties traditionally emphasized in autism descriptions. An autistic child might not recognize the sensation of hunger until they feel faint, might not perceive the urge to urinate until it becomes urgent, or might struggle to identify when they feel anxious versus excited (Garfinkel et al., 2016).

These interoceptive differences in autism carry practical implications that affect daily functioning. Difficulty recognizing hunger and satiety can lead to irregular eating patterns or food-related challenges. Problems identifying the need to use the bathroom can persist longer than expected in development. The inability to accurately perceive and label internal emotional states - a phenomenon called alexithymia that often co-occurs with autism - may reflect underlying interoceptive differences. When someone cannot reliably sense the bodily correlates of emotions, understanding and communicating feelings becomes substantially more difficult.

Recent research has also explored whether interoceptive training might benefit autistic individuals. Programs that help people learn to identify and interpret bodily signals have shown promise in some studies, suggesting that interoceptive abilities can be enhanced through targeted intervention. However, it's crucial to recognize that different does not necessarily mean deficient. Some researchers advocate for a neurodiversity perspective that respects varied ways of experiencing embodiment rather than automatically treating differences as deficits requiring correction.

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) also involves alterations in interoceptive processing, though these have received less research attention than in autism. Individuals with ADHD may struggle to recognize bodily signals amid the competing demands on their attention. Forgetting to eat, not noticing discomfort until it becomes severe, or having difficulty winding down for sleep despite clear fatigue may all reflect interoceptive challenges. The relationship between ADHD and interoception likely involves both bottom-up factors - differences in signal processing - and top-down factors related to attention allocation.

Chronic pain conditions represent another crucial intersection of disability and interoception. Conditions like fibromyalgia, chronic regional pain syndrome, and central sensitization syndromes involve alterations in how pain signals are generated and processed. While pain perception involves specific nociceptive pathways, it also engages the interoceptive system broadly. People with chronic pain often show altered interoceptive processing extending beyond pain itself, including changes in temperature perception, cardiac awareness, and the interpretation of various bodily sensations.

The relationship between chronic pain and interoception is bidirectional and complex. Chronic pain conditions may alter interoceptive processing, leading to heightened awareness of bodily sensations and lower thresholds for perceiving signals as concerning or threatening. Conversely, differences in interoceptive processing might predispose some individuals to develop chronic pain conditions or influence how pain progresses once it begins. Research suggests that people with chronic pain may show both heightened interoceptive accuracy for some signals and altered interpretation of these signals, often catastrophizing or attaching negative meaning to bodily sensations (Di Lernia et al., 2016).

Anxiety disorders demonstrate particularly clear links with interoceptive processing. Panic disorder, in particular, centrally involves the misinterpretation of interoceptive signals. A person might perceive their heart racing and interpret this as evidence of imminent cardiac arrest, triggering a cascade of fear responses that further amplify bodily sensations. This creates a vicious cycle where interoceptive awareness, interpretation, and physiological response become mutually reinforcing. Treatment approaches like interoceptive exposure therapy work specifically by helping individuals develop different relationships with bodily sensations.

Eating disorders involve profound disturbances in interoceptive processing, particularly related to hunger, satiety, and the subjective experience of the body. People with anorexia nervosa often report not feeling hungry even when severely undernourished, while those with binge eating disorder may struggle to recognize satiety. These interoceptive disturbances are not merely consequences of disordered eating but appear to be fundamental features that contribute to the development and maintenance of these conditions. Research has found that individuals with eating disorders show altered insular cortex activation patterns during interoceptive tasks, suggesting neurobiological differences in how bodily signals are processed (Khalsa et al., 2015).

Individuals with spinal cord injuries face unique interoceptive challenges resulting from interruption of ascending sensory pathways. Depending on the level and completeness of injury, signals from portions of the body below the injury site may not reach the brain, creating what some researchers describe as a "disconnection" from parts of the body. This affects not only obvious sensations like touch and pain but also interoceptive signals related to bladder and bowel fullness, temperature regulation, and cardiovascular function. People with spinal cord injuries must often rely on cognitive strategies and external monitoring to manage functions that others handle through automatic interoceptive awareness.

The consequences of impaired interoception following spinal cord injury extend beyond physical health management. The sense of self, the feeling of inhabiting one's body, and emotional experiences all depend partly on interoceptive processing. Some individuals with spinal cord injuries report alterations in emotional experiences, possibly reflecting reduced interoceptive feedback that would normally accompany emotions. Research in this area has contributed to broader theoretical understanding of how bodily signals contribute to conscious feelings.

Neurodegenerative conditions like Parkinson's disease involve changes in interoceptive processing as part of their broader impact on nervous system function. People with Parkinson's may experience altered awareness of bodily sensations, changes in autonomic function that affect interoceptive signals, and modifications in how the brain processes internal information. These changes contribute to non-motor symptoms that significantly impact quality of life, including constipation, urinary problems, and alterations in the experience of emotions.

Stroke affecting the insular cortex or related brain regions can produce specific interoceptive deficits. Individuals might lose the ability to sense certain bodily states or might develop heightened or distorted interoceptive experiences. Right insular damage, in particular, has been associated with altered cardiac interoception and changes in emotional awareness. These specific lesion studies have contributed substantially to neuroscientific understanding of interoceptive brain networks.

Intellectual and developmental disabilities present diverse pictures regarding interoceptive processing. Some individuals may have difficulty recognizing, labeling, or communicating about internal states, which can complicate health management and emotional regulation. However, the underlying interoceptive abilities may vary considerably. The challenge often lies in finding appropriate methods to support interoceptive awareness and expression given communication differences and cognitive profiles.

Mental health conditions broadly intersect with interoceptive processing in ways that are increasingly recognized as clinically significant. Depression involves alterations in interoceptive processing, with some individuals experiencing blunted awareness of bodily signals and others showing heightened focus on discomfort or fatigue. Post-traumatic stress disorder fundamentally involves dysregulated responses to both interoceptive and exteroceptive signals, with survivors often experiencing their bodies as sources of threat rather than safety. Treatment approaches that address the body's role in psychological distress, including somatic therapies, work partly by helping individuals develop different relationships with interoceptive experiences.

Implications for Health Care and Support

The growing understanding of interoception carries significant implications for how we approach health care, particularly for older adults and people with disabilities. Traditional medical practice often focuses on objective physiological measurements while paying less attention to how individuals subjectively experience and interpret bodily signals. An interoceptive lens suggests we need more nuanced approaches.

For older adults, assessment of interoceptive abilities might identify those at elevated risk for dehydration, malnutrition, or delayed recognition of serious illness. Simple questions about thirst perception, temperature awareness, and hunger could supplement standard geriatric assessments. Education about age-related changes in how the body signals needs might empower seniors to use cognitive strategies - like drinking on schedule rather than waiting for thirst - to maintain health.

In disability contexts, recognizing interoceptive differences as legitimate variations in how individuals experience embodiment, rather than deficits requiring correction, represents an important shift. Support might focus on helping people develop personalized strategies for managing needs given their particular interoceptive profile. For an autistic person who doesn't reliably feel hunger, this might mean establishing regular eating schedules. For someone with chronic pain and altered interoceptive processing, it might involve learning to distinguish between sensations that require response and those that don't signal danger.

Interoceptive awareness training has emerged as a potential therapeutic approach across various conditions. These interventions help individuals develop greater accuracy in perceiving bodily signals and more adaptive interpretations of these sensations. While evidence for effectiveness continues to accumulate, initial results suggest promise for conditions ranging from anxiety disorders to eating disorders to some autism-related challenges.

Conclusion

Interoception - the perception of our internal bodily landscape - represents a fundamental aspect of human experience that shapes health, emotion, behavior, and identity throughout life. While this "hidden sense" operates largely outside conscious awareness, its influence extends into nearly every domain of functioning. For older adults, age-related changes in interoceptive processing create both challenges and opportunities, affecting everything from hydration status to emotional well-being. For people with disabilities, variations in interoceptive processing contribute to diverse experiences of embodiment that deserve understanding and accommodation rather than automatic pathologization.

As research continues to illuminate the mechanisms and significance of interoception, opportunities emerge for more effective healthcare approaches, more informed support strategies, and deeper appreciation for the varied ways humans experience life in their bodies. The brain's continuous interpretation of signals from within creates the felt sense of being alive, the embodied nature of emotion, and the moment-to-moment awareness that we exist as physical beings in the world. Understanding this fundamental process brings us closer to understanding what it means to be human.

References

Craig, A. D. (2002). How do you feel? Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3(8), 655-666.

Craig, A. D. (2009). How do you feel - now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(1), 59-70.

Critchley, H. D., & Harrison, N. A. (2013). Visceral influences on brain and behavior. Neuron, 77(4), 624-638.

Critchley, H. D., Wiens, S., Rotshtein, P., Öhman, A., & Dolan, R. J. (2004). Neural systems supporting interoceptive awareness. Nature Neuroscience, 7(2), 189-195.

Damasio, A. R. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. Harcourt Brace.

Di Lernia, D., Serino, S., & Riva, G. (2016). Pain in the body: Altered interoception in chronic pain conditions. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 71, 328-341.

Farrell, M. J., Zamarripa, F., Shade, R., Phillips, P. A., McKinley, M., Fox, P. T., Blair-West, J., Denton, D. A., & Egan, G. F. (2008). Effect of aging on regional cerebral blood flow responses associated with osmotic thirst and its satiation by water drinking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(1), 382-387.

Garfinkel, S. N., Seth, A. K., Barrett, A. B., Suzuki, K., & Critchley, H. D. (2015). Knowing your own heart: Distinguishing interoceptive accuracy from interoceptive awareness. Biological Psychology, 104, 65-74.

Garfinkel, S. N., Tiley, C., O'Keeffe, S., Harrison, N. A., Seth, A. K., & Critchley, H. D. (2016). Discrepancies between dimensions of interoception in autism. Scientific Reports, 6, 41909.

Khalsa, S. S., Adolphs, R., Cameron, O. G., Critchley, H. D., Davenport, P. W., Feinstein, J. S., Feusner, J. D., Garfinkel, S. N., Lane, R. D., Mehling, W. E., Meuret, A. E., Nemeroff, C. B., Oppenheimer, S., Petzschner, F. H., Pollatos, O., Rhudy, J. L., Schramm, L. P., Simmons, W. K., Stein, M. B., ... & Paulus, M. P. (2018). Interoception and mental health. Biological Psychiatry, 83(6), 487-497.

Khalsa, S. S., Craske, M. G., Li, W., Vangala, S., Strober, M., & Feusner, J. D. (2015). Altered interoceptive awareness in anorexia nervosa. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 52, 75-89.

Paulus, M. P., & Stein, M. B. (2010). Interoception in anxiety and depression. Brain Structure and Function, 214(5-6), 451-463.

Seth, A. K., & Friston, K. J. (2016). Active interoceptive inference and the emotional brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 371(1708), 20160007.

Sherrington, C. S. (1906). The integrative action of the nervous system. Yale University Press.

Teasdale, N., Simoneau, M., Corbeil, P., Handrigan, G., Tremblay, A., & Hue, O. (2013). Obesity alters balance and movement control. Current Obesity Reports, 2(3), 235-240.

Insights, Analysis, and Developments

Author Credentials: Ian is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of Disabled World, a leading resource for news and information on disability issues. With a global perspective shaped by years of travel and lived experience, Ian is a committed proponent of the Social Model of Disability-a transformative framework developed by disabled activists in the 1970s that emphasizes dismantling societal barriers rather than focusing solely on individual impairments. His work reflects a deep commitment to disability rights, accessibility, and social inclusion. To learn more about Ian's background, expertise, and accomplishments, visit his full biography.